Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
In-flight automated external defibrillator use and consultation patterns
Aaron Michael Brown1, Jon C Rittenberger, Charles M Ammon
1University of Pittsburgh Affiliated Residency in Emergency Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15216, USA. brownam3@upmc.edu
In-flight automated external defibrillator (AED) use shows a 50% survival rate for ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) cardiac arrest, but overall survival remains low at 15%. Ground medical consultation is underutilized during these emergencies.
Area of Science:
- Aviation Medicine
- Emergency Medical Services
- Cardiology
Background:
- Limited data exists on the use and outcomes of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) during commercial airline flights.
- Understanding in-flight AED application is crucial for improving emergency cardiac care in the unique environment of air travel.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize the use of AEDs during in-flight medical emergencies.
- To determine the outcomes of automated external defibrillator (AED) application in patients experiencing cardiac arrest on commercial flights.
- To analyze patterns of ground medical consultation associated with in-flight AED use.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 169 automated external defibrillator (AED) applications reported to an airline consultation service across three U.S. airlines (May 2004-March 2009).
- Data collected included patient demographics, initial cardiac rhythm, shock delivery and success, survival to admission, and use of ground medical consultation.
- Cardiac rhythms were classified, and success was defined as return of a perfusing rhythm.
Main Results:
- Of 169 AED applications, 40 involved cardiac arrest. Survival was 15% overall (6/40), with 50% survival (5/10) for patients with initial ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT).
- AEDs were used for monitoring in 129 cases (76%). Fourteen patients received defibrillation, primarily for VF/VT.
- Ground medical consultation was obtained in only 33-35% of AED use cases and cardiac arrests.
Conclusions:
- In-flight AED use achieved a 50% survival rate for ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) cardiac arrest, highlighting the device's potential.
- Overall survival for in-flight cardiac arrest remains poor (15%), particularly for non-shockable rhythms.
- The study underscores the need for increased utilization of ground medical consultation during in-flight medical emergencies involving AEDs.
More Related Videos
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
16:40A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...