Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Scalable Syntheses of Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide using Cascade Design Oxidation and Highly Basic Reduction Reactions
Published on: July 3, 2025
A comparison between physically and chemically driven etching in the oxidation of graphite surfaces.
P Solís-Fernández1, J I Paredes, A Cosío
1Instituto Nacional del Carbón, CSIC, Apartado 73, 33080 Oviedo, Spain.
Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) air plasma and ultraviolet-generated ozone (UVO) treatments etch graphite surfaces differently. DBD plasma uses ion bombardment, unlike UVO, leading to distinct surface modifications and etching selectivity for carbon materials.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Surface Chemistry
- Plasma Physics
Background:
- Graphite surface modification is crucial for advanced material applications.
- Oxidative treatments offer pathways for controlled surface functionalization.
- Understanding etching mechanisms is key to tailoring material properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the surface etching mechanisms of graphite using dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) air plasma and ultraviolet-generated ozone (UVO).
- To investigate the selectivity and atomic-scale evolution of surface defects induced by each treatment.
- To correlate surface structural changes with spectroscopic data for comprehensive analysis.
Main Methods:
- Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) for atomic-scale surface visualization.
- Raman spectroscopy to analyze changes in graphite structure and bonding.
- X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) for elemental composition and chemical state analysis.
Main Results:
- Both DBD air plasma and UVO initiate etching via atomic vacancies.
- DBD air plasma involves physical processes like ion bombardment, absent in UVO.
- Distinct etching selectivity and surface modification mechanisms were observed between DBD and UVO treatments.
- STM, Raman, and XPS data consistently supported the proposed etching mechanisms.
Conclusions:
- The choice between DBD air plasma and UVO depends on the desired etching selectivity and surface modification outcome for graphite.
- Different physical and chemical mechanisms govern graphite etching by plasma and ozone.
- This comparative study provides essential information for selecting appropriate surface modification techniques for carbon materials.
More Related Videos
10:27Simultaneous Multi-surface Anodizations and Stair-like Reverse Biases Detachment of Anodic Aluminum Oxides in Sulfuric and Oxalic Acid Electrolyte
Published on: October 5, 2017
06:58Electrochemical Etching and Characterization of Sharp Field Emission Points for Electron Impact Ionization
Published on: July 12, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Processes at Electrodes
Heterogeneous Catalysis
Oxidations of Aldehydes and Ketones to Carboxylic Acids
Aldehydes readily undergo oxidation in strong oxidizing agents such as potassium permanganate and chromic acid. The oxidation can also be carried out using mild oxidizing agents such as silver oxide. In fact, aldehydes can be easily oxidized...
Oxidation of Alkenes: Syn Dihydroxylation with Osmium Tetraoxide
Oxidation of Alcohols
The process of oxidation in a chemical reaction is observed in any of the three forms:
Preparation of Epoxides
Epoxides result from alkene oxidation, which can be achieved by a) air, b) peroxy acids, c) hypochlorous acids, and d) halohydrin cyclization.
Epoxidation with Peroxy Acids
Epoxidation of alkenes via oxidation with peroxy acids involves the conversion of a carbon–carbon double bond to an epoxide using the oxidizing agent meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid, commonly known as MCPBA. Since the O–O bond of peroxy acids is very weak, the addition of electrophilic oxygen of peroxy acids to...