Cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation in patients with therapeutic international normalized ratios

Hamid Ghanbari1, Dustin Feldman, Martin Schmidt

  • 1Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Providence Hospital and Medical Centers/Wayne State University, Southfield, Michigan, USA.

Insights

Continuing warfarin therapy during cardiac resynchronization therapy device (CRT-D) implantation is safe for high-risk patients. This approach reduces pocket hematomas and shortens hospital stays compared to bridging therapy.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Electrophysiology
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Many patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) also need chronic anticoagulation.
  • Current guidelines suggest discontinuing warfarin and using bridging therapy for CRT procedures.
  • This study investigates the safety of CRT-device (CRT-D) implantation without warfarin interruption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of continuing warfarin therapy during CRT-D implantation in patients at high risk for thromboembolic events.
  • To compare outcomes between patients who continued warfarin, received bridging therapy, or had warfarin cessation.

Main Methods:

  • 123 consecutive patients undergoing CRT-D implantation were enrolled.
  • 49 high-risk patients received heparin, low molecular weight heparin, or warfarin therapy.
  • 74 low-risk patients had warfarin cessation; all groups were monitored for hematomas, thromboembolic events, bleeding, and length of stay.

Main Results:

  • The bridging therapy group had significantly higher rates of pocket hematomas (20.7%) and longer hospital stays (3.7 days) compared to control (4.1%, 1.6 days) and warfarin groups (5.0%, 2.9 days).
  • Patients with prosthetic mechanical mitral valves had a higher incidence of pocket hematoma formation (20%).
  • No significant difference in hematoma formation was observed between upgrade procedures and new device implantations.

Conclusions:

  • Implanting CRT-Ds without interrupting warfarin therapy is a safe alternative for high-risk patients.
  • This strategy reduces the risk of pocket hematomas and shortens hospital stays.
  • Avoidance of bridging therapy simplifies management and improves patient outcomes.
Abstract