Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction from inductive reasoning. It uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From these general principles, a scientist can predict specific results that remain valid as long as the general principles are correct.For example, a researcher can make specific predictions from the hypothesis "butterflies are attracted...
Constraints and Statical Determinacy01:26

Constraints and Statical Determinacy

In structural engineering, the equilibrium of a system is not only determined by its equations of equilibrium but also with the help of constraints. Constraints refer to restrictions on the motion of a system. The proper combinations of constraints can minimize the total number of constraints needed to maintain a system in mechanical equilibrium. When this happens, the system is said to be statically determinate. For such systems, the unknown reaction supports can be estimated using equilibrium...
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?01:17

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reasoning From Quantified Modal Premises.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

Human verifications: Computable with truth values outside logic.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2023
Same author

How poetry evokes emotions.

Acta psychologica·2022
Same author

Conditional content, explicit information and generating cases: Sources for suppressing inferences.

Acta psychologica·2020
Same author

Psychoanalytic psychotherapy and its supervision via videoconference: experience, questions and dilemmas.

American journal of psychoanalysis·2019
Same author

The Analytic Truth and Falsity of Disjunctions.

Cognitive science·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

The modulation of conditional assertions and its effects on reasoning.

Ana Cristina Quelhas1, Philip N Johnson-Laird, Csongor Juhos

  • 1Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon, Portugal. cquelhas@ispa.pt

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|March 6, 2010
PubMed
Summary

The theory of mental models explains conditional reasoning, showing how background knowledge shapes interpretations of "if A then C" statements. Experiments confirm these modulated meanings influence logical conclusions and temporal judgments.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Logic

Background:

  • The theory of mental models offers a framework for understanding conditional reasoning.
  • Conditional statements (if A then C) possess a core meaning encompassing multiple possibilities.
  • Contextual factors and general knowledge can modulate these core meanings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how mental models and their modulations influence the interpretation of conditional statements.
  • To examine these effects in both factual and deontic (obligation-based) reasoning domains.
  • To test predictions derived from the mental model theory across four experiments.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Participants constructed possible and impossible instances based on conditionals.
  • Experiment 2: Assessed conclusions accepted under time constraints.
  • Experiment 3: Participants generated their own conclusions.
  • Experiment 4: Examined temporal relations influenced by modulation.

Main Results:

  • Results supported the mental model theory's predictions regarding core meanings.
  • Evidence confirmed the occurrence and impact of meaning modulation.
  • Modulated interpretations influenced logical conclusions and temporal judgments as predicted.
  • Time limits affected response patterns consistent with the theory.

Conclusions:

  • The study validates the mental model theory's account of conditional reasoning.
  • Contextual modulation significantly shapes the interpretation of conditional statements.
  • Findings have implications for understanding human reasoning in various domains.