Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Lie-detection biases among male police interrogators, prisoners, and laypersons
1Ariel University Center, Ariel, Israel. elaad@netvision.net.il
Abstract:
Beliefs of 28 male police interrogators, 30 male prisoners, and 30 male laypersons about their skill in detecting lies and truths told by others, and in telling lies and truths convincingly themselves, were compared. As predicted, police interrogators overestimated their lie-detection skills. In fact, they were affected by stereotypical beliefs about verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. Prisoners were similarly affected by stereotypical misconceptions about deceptive behaviors but were able to identify that lying is related to pupil dilation. They assessed their lie-detection skill as similar to that of laypersons, but less than that of police interrogators. In contrast to interrogators, prisoners tended to rate lower their lie-telling skill than did the other groups. Results were explained in terms of anchoring and self-assessment bias. Practical aspects of the results for criminal interrogation were discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Confirmation Biases
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Surveys
