Mitigation approaches to combat the flu pandemic
Raman Chawla1, Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Deepali Madaan
1Division of CBRN Defense, Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences, Brig SK Mazumdar Marg, Delhi - 110 054, India.
Abstract:
Management of flu pandemic is a perpetual challenge for the medical fraternity since time immemorial. Animal to human transmission has been observed thrice in the last century within an average range of 11-39 years of antigenic recycling. The recent outbreak of influenza A (H1N1, also termed as swine flu), first reported in Mexico on April 26, 2009, occurred in the forty first year since last reported flu pandemic (July 1968). Within less than 50 days, it has assumed pandemic proportions (phase VI) affecting over 76 countries with 163 deaths/35,928 cases (as on 15(th) June 2009). It indicated the re-emergence of genetically reassorted virus having strains endemic to humans, swine and avian (H5N1). The World Health Organisation (WHO) member states have already pulled up their socks and geared up to combat such criticalities. Earlier outbreaks of avian flu (H5N1) in different countries led WHO to develop pandemic preparedness strategies with national/regional plans on pandemic preparedness. Numerous factors related to climatic conditions, socio-economic strata, governance and sharing of information/logistics at all levels have been considered critical indicators in monitoring the dynamics of escalation towards a pandemic situation.The National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), Government of India, with the active cooperation of UN agencies and other stakeholders/experts has formulated a concept paper on role of nonhealth service providers during pandemics in April 2008 and released national guidelines - management of biological disasters in July 2008. These guidelines enumerate that the success of medical management endeavors like pharmaceutical (anti-viral Oseltamivir and Zanamivir therapies), nonpharmaceutical interventions and vaccination development etc., largely depends on level of resistance offered by mutagenic viral strain and rationale use of pharmaco therapeutic interventions. This article describes the mitigation approach to combat flu pandemic with its effective implementation at national, state and local levels.
Insights
This study discusses managing flu pandemics, focusing on the 2009 H1N1 outbreak and India
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Disaster Management
Background:
- Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic preparedness is a global challenge.
- The 2009 H1N1 outbreak highlighted the re-emergence of reassorted influenza strains.
- Previous avian flu outbreaks prompted the World Health Organization to develop pandemic strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe mitigation approaches for combating flu pandemics.
- To outline effective implementation strategies at national, state, and local levels.
- To emphasize the role of non-health service providers in pandemic management.
Main Methods:
- Review of national guidelines and concept papers on biological disaster management.
- Analysis of factors influencing pandemic escalation (climate, socio-economics, governance).
- Consideration of pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions.
Main Results:
- The 2009 H1N1 outbreak rapidly became a global pandemic.
- Success of medical management depends on viral strain resistance and rational use of therapies.
- India's National Disaster Management Authority has developed guidelines for biological disasters.
Conclusions:
- Effective flu pandemic mitigation requires multi-level implementation.
- Coordination between health and non-health sectors is crucial.
- Preparedness strategies must address viral mutation and intervention efficacy.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Smallpox
Methods of reducing fever
Pharmacological Methods of Reducing Fever:
Influenza
Inhibitors Of Virion Release
Infectious Diseases and Their Occurrence


