Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Comparative effects of carvedilol vs bisoprolol for severe congestive heart failure
Masanori Konishi1, Go Haraguchi, Shigeki Kimura
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Insights
Carvedilol and bisoprolol equally improve severe heart failure (HF). However, bisoprolol demonstrates better outcomes for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including heart rate control and rhythm restoration.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Carvedilol and bisoprolol are established treatments for heart failure (HF).
- Limited comparative data exists for their efficacy in severe HF patients.
- This study addresses the need for comparative analysis in this population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical effects of carvedilol and bisoprolol in patients with severe heart failure.
- To evaluate differences in outcomes, particularly in patients with co-existing atrial fibrillation (AF).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 655 heart failure patients (NYHA Class 3-4).
- 217 patients receiving carvedilol (n=110) or bisoprolol (n=107) were analyzed.
- 18-month follow-up period assessing survival and cardiac events.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in survival or cardiac event-free rates between carvedilol and bisoprolol for overall severe HF.
- In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), bisoprolol showed significant improvements in heart rate and brain natriuretic peptide levels compared to carvedilol.
- Bisoprolol led to a higher rate of defibrillation from AF to sinus rhythm (48% vs. 16%).
Conclusions:
- Carvedilol and bisoprolol exhibit comparable efficacy in improving severe heart failure.
- Bisoprolol demonstrates superior benefits for heart failure patients also suffering from atrial fibrillation.
- Bisoprolol may be a preferred choice for managing severe HF with AF.
Background:
Although carvedilol and bisoprolol are effective medicines for the treatment of patients with heart failure (HF), only a few reports have compared their effects. This study was designed to compare the effects of them in patients with severe HF.
Methods And Results:
A total of 655 consecutive patients with HF, categorized as New York Heart Association Class 3 or 4, were retrospectively investigated. Of these patients, 217 were administered beta-blockers after admission and were divided into 2 groups (carvedilol, n=110; bisoprolol, n=107). No significant differences were observed in their characteristics between the 2 groups prior to the introduction of the beta-blockers. After 18 months of follow-up, there were no significant differences in the survival and cardiac event-free rates between the 2 groups. In contrast, there were several significant differences in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) (carvedilol, n=40; bisoprolol, n=43). The percent changes in heart rate and brain natriuretic peptide level improved significantly in the bisoprolol group than in the carvedilol group. Furthermore, more patients in the bisoprolol group were defibrillated from AF to sinus rhythm than those in the carvedilol group (48% vs 16%; P=0.03).
Conclusions:
Our data suggest that the 2 beta-blockers are equally effective in the improvement of severe HF, but bisoprolol shows favorable effects in patients with AF.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of β-Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions of β-Receptor Blockers