Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 14, 2026
05:49
Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images
Published on: February 23, 2024
Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods
Michelle C Tanure1, Alan P Pinheiro, Anamaria S Oliveira
1Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil 14.049-900. mitanure@usp.br
Summary
Computer-assisted Cobb angle measurements from digital X-rays are as reliable as traditional manual methods for assessing scoliosis. This digital approach offers clinical advantages for evaluating spinal curvature.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Orthopedics
- Medical Imaging Analysis
Background:
- The vertebral spine angle in the frontal plane is crucial for scoliosis assessment, often measured from X-ray images.
- Digital X-ray technology is increasingly used in clinical settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of computer-assisted Cobb angle measurements using digital X-ray images.
- To compare the accuracy of digital versus manual Cobb angle measurements.
Main Methods:
- A clinical investigation quantifying scoliotic deformity using the Cobb method.
- Assessed intra- and interobserver variability with manual and digital techniques.
- Developed software to semiautomatically calculate scoliotic deformity from digital X-rays.
Main Results:
- Computer-assisted Cobb angle measurements demonstrated reliability comparable to the traditional manual method.
- Measurements were reproducible under conditions similar to clinical practice.
Conclusions:
- The computer-assisted (digital) method is clinically advantageous for assessing scoliotic curvature.
- This digital approach is appropriate for evaluating the frontal plane spinal curvature using the Cobb method.
Related Concept Videos
01:12Adjusting a Traverse
In the site survey of a four-sided traverse, internal angles are essential to ensure geometric accuracy. The survey revealed that the sum of the measured internal angles was 359 degrees and 48 minutes, which is 12 minutes less than the expected 360 degrees. This discrepancy signals an error likely arising from measurement inaccuracies during the fieldwork.To rectify this error, the adjustment process involved distributing the 12-minute shortfall equally across the four internal angles. By...
01:15Distance Corrections
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
01:18Errors in Taping
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
02:46Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...