Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random Sampling Method

Random Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026

Same author

Clarifying the concept of visual load: a systematic review.

Ergonomics·2026

Same author

Measuring and understanding emotional attachment in human-AI relationships.

Ergonomics·2026

Same author

Human trust and intention to use intelligent agents: the impact of intelligent agents' ability to understand human intentions and emotions.

Ergonomics·2026

Same author

Ergonomics evaluation modeling of multimodal interaction technology for airplane cockpit and experimental validation.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2026

Same author

Graspability in disguise: The cognitive and neural differences in processing words representing small and big objects.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 13, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Validating the random search model for two targets of different difficulty.

Alan H S Chan¹, Ruifeng Yu

¹Department of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tonk, Hong Kong. alan.chan@cityu.edu.hk

Perceptual and Motor Skills

|April 16, 2010

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A random visual search model effectively describes search behavior in a double-target task. Findings suggest its use in optimizing inspection systems, with potential memory-guided search for difficult targets.

More Related Videos

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 13, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Human Factors Engineering
Visual Perception

Background:

Visual search tasks are fundamental to understanding human attention and decision-making.
Optimizing inspection systems requires accurate models of human search behavior.
Previous models have limitations in predicting search times for complex tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the adequacy and predictive accuracy of a random visual search model.
To determine if search strategy can be inferred from search time distributions.
To assess the model's applicability for optimizing inspection system design.

Main Methods:

Fitting a random visual search model to 1,788 search times from a nonidentical double-target search task.
Analyzing mean and median search times and response times for individual and pooled data.
Recruiting 30 Hong Kong Chinese participants (ages 18-33) for voluntary participation.

Main Results:

The random search model demonstrated overall adequacy and prediction accuracy.
Search strategy could be reasonably inferred from search time distributions.
The model's applicability for optimizing inspection systems was supported.

Conclusions:

The random search model generally describes visual search behavior in this task.
Memory-guided search may influence the detection of more difficult targets.
Abnormally long search times might be linked to visual lobe characteristics or fixation patterns.