Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
Are some features easier to bind than others? The congruency effect.
1Department of Psychology, Center for the Study of Brain, Mind, and Behavior, Princeton University, Green Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. lgoldfar@princeton.edu
Cognitive systems avoid processing conflicting information, a principle called the incongruence-suppression rule. This rule impacts how we combine object features, leading to increased errors when features are mismatched.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive psychology
- Perception
- Human cognition
Background:
- Perceptual errors often involve incorrectly binding object features.
- The cognitive system tends to reject incongruent thoughts or feelings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of the incongruence-suppression rule on feature binding.
- To identify and characterize the 'binding congruency effect'.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed feature-binding tasks with either congruent or incongruent feature sets.
- Experiments involved binding digits with physical sizes and color words with colored fonts.
- Feature migration within the same level was examined in Experiment 3.
Main Results:
- An increased error rate was observed when participants bound incongruent features.
- Participants substituted incongruent features with congruent ones.
- The binding congruency effect was shown to depend on feature migration.
Conclusions:
- The incongruence-suppression rule constrains the feature binding process.
- The binding congruency effect demonstrates a mechanism for resolving feature incongruence.
- Cognitive processing actively avoids or resolves feature mismatches during binding.
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Complexation Equilibria: The Chelate Effect
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Relationship Formation
Cause and Effect

