Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026
06:16
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Defining priorities in prognostication research: results of a consensus workshop
C Stevinson1, N Preston, C Todd
1School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Palliative Medicine
|May 27, 2010
Summary
Palliative care researchers identified key priorities for prognostication research. The highest priority is validating prognostic tools to improve their clinical utility and patient care.
Area of Science:
- Palliative Care Research
- Prognostication Science
- Clinical Decision Support
Background:
- Accurate prognostication is crucial in palliative care for treatment planning and patient communication.
- Existing prognostic tools require validation to ensure their reliability and clinical applicability.
- Research priorities in prognostication need to be established to guide future scientific endeavors.
Framework:
- A nominal group technique was utilized to achieve consensus among experts.
- The framework involved a workshop at a scientific meeting focused on prognostication.
- Participants generated and prioritized research questions through facilitated group discussions.
Implementation:
- Twenty-five palliative care researchers, including physicians, nurses, and academic researchers, participated.
- A total of 40 research questions were generated during the workshop.
- Prioritization ratings identified the top five research questions based on expert consensus.
Implications:
- The consensus highlights the critical need for validating prognostic tools in clinical practice.
- Further research into the validity of prognostic tools is essential for enhancing their clinical value.
- Addressing these priorities will advance the science of prognostication in palliative care.
Related Concept Videos
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
01:21Planning Nursing Care I
The planning phase of the nursing process helps nurses set priorities, outline patient-centered goals and expected outcomes, and tailor nursing interventions to align with the aligned care plan. Through the planning phase, the nurse applies critical thinking skills to align and develop interventions according to the patient's needs. It provides continuity of care allowing patients to receive the maximum benefit from treatment. It serves as a pilot plan for allocating individual staff to a...
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
03:26Framing Effects
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
01:20Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...