Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 12, 2026

06:28
E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Collaboration on progress testing in medical schools in the Netherlands
Lambert Schuwirth1, Giel Bosman, Robert H Henning
1Department of Educational Development and Research, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands. l.schuwirth@educ.unimaas.nl
Medical Teacher
|June 3, 2010
Summary
Collaborative progress testing among Dutch medical schools significantly reduces resources and enhances curricula. Despite logistical challenges, the benefits of this joint effort, including multi-centre research, outweigh the drawbacks.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Health Professions Education
Background:
- Progress testing was initially developed at Maastricht University.
- Collaboration among Dutch medical schools for progress testing began in the late 1990s.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of a collaborative progress testing initiative among Dutch medical schools.
- To assess the advantages and disadvantages of inter-institutional collaboration in administering progress tests.
Main Methods:
- A collaborative model for developing and administering a progress test was implemented.
- The progress test is currently administered to five out of eight medical schools in the Netherlands.
Main Results:
- The collaboration resulted in a significant decrease in necessary resources per participating school.
- The shared data facilitate inter-school comparisons and curriculum improvement.
- Logistical challenges and differing views on item quality were identified as disadvantages.
Conclusions:
- The advantages of the collaborative progress testing model significantly outweigh the disadvantages.
- Formal legal agreements are crucial for successful collaboration, alongside collegial communication.
- The collaboration establishes a critical mass for multi-centre research and development in progress testing.
