Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pictures are not always worth a thousand words: Non-probative pictures did not increase the effectiveness of misinformation corrections.

Journal of applied research in memory and cognition·2026
Same author

Brain organization of a memory champion.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Does repetition increase perceived truth equally for conspiracy and trivia statements? A registered replication report.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Is that true? Examining the effects of question wording on the effectiveness of political fact checks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2025
Same author

Aesthetic experience is supported by spontaneous autobiographical memory recollection.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

How prior knowledge and statement truth affect retrieval experiences over time.

Memory (Hove, England)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests.

Lisa K Fazio1, Pooja K Agarwal, Elizabeth J Marsh

  • 1Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. lkf@duke.edu

Memory & Cognition
|June 3, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Prior testing aids later test performance but can also lead to errors. Both positive and negative effects of multiple-choice testing persist over a week, especially when the test is delayed.

More Related Videos

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories
08:53

Using a Classroom-Based Deese Roediger McDermott Paradigm to Assess the Effects of Imagery on False Memories

Published on: November 14, 2018

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Multiple-choice testing influences subsequent test performance.
  • Prior testing enhances correct recall but may increase susceptibility to incorrect 'lures'.
  • The long-term impact of these negative testing effects remains under-explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the durability of both positive and negative effects of multiple-choice testing over a one-week delay.
  • To determine if delayed testing exacerbates or mitigates these effects.
  • To assess the role of recollection in both positive and negative testing phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • Participants completed multiple-choice and cued recall tests at immediate and delayed (one-week) intervals after studying.
  • Testing involved subsets of studied material.
  • Analysis focused on comparing performance between immediate and delayed test conditions.

Main Results:

  • Both positive effects (increased correct answers) and negative effects (increased lure errors) of prior testing were observed after a one-week delay.
  • The delay reduced the magnitude of both positive and negative testing effects.
  • These effects were more pronounced when the multiple-choice test itself was delayed.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that both beneficial and detrimental effects of multiple-choice testing are durable over time.
  • Recollection is a plausible mechanism underlying both the positive and negative consequences of testing.
  • The timing of the multiple-choice test significantly influences the persistence of its effects on subsequent learning and memory.