Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The differential role of language and executive functions in the relation between socioeconomic status and theory of mind in preschool and school-aged children.

Trends in neuroscience and education·2026
Same author

Academic Resilience in Contexts of Inequality: Motivational and Self-Efficacy Profiles of Disadvantaged High Achievers.

Journal of adolescence·2026
Same author

Executive functions as mediators of early educational disparities by SES, gender and birth month.

NPJ science of learning·2026
Same author

Among well-being, cognitive, metacognitive and socio-emotional skills, executive functions best explain SES-achievement inequalities.

Trends in neuroscience and education·2026
Same author

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for an illusory truth effect and its determinants.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Domain-general and domain-specific cognitive factors mediating the relationship between math anxiety and mathematical performance in primary school children.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: When illusion rivals reality. Investigating error detection and the role of working memory resources in the Vanishing Ball Illusion.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Metaphors and the Body: Perceived Locations for the Self are Influenced by Conceptual Metaphor.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Individual differences in spatial mental imagery.

Grégoire Borst1, Stephen M Kosslyn

  • 1Harvard University, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. borst@wjh.harvard.edu

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|June 4, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel method to objectively measure spatial mental imagery. Findings show this new measure correlates with traditional spatial tests but not object imagery, differentiating spatial cognition.

More Related Videos

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data
06:36

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data

Published on: October 18, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data
06:36

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data

Published on: October 18, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Individual differences in spatial mental imagery are crucial for understanding cognitive abilities.
  • Existing methods for assessing spatial imagery often lack objective measurement of location-based mental representations.
  • Distinguishing between spatial and object-based mental imagery is important for cognitive theory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a new image-scanning paradigm for objectively measuring individual differences in spatial mental imagery, specifically location-based imagery.
  • To investigate the relationship between the precision required in a spatial judgment task and the accuracy of the underlying mental image.
  • To determine if the developed measure of spatial imagery correlates with established psychometric tests of spatial ability and object imagery.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel image-scanning paradigm where participants judged if an arrow pointed to a dot within a mentally visualized array.
  • Manipulated task precision to assess its impact on response time and error rates, reflecting mental image accuracy.
  • Correlated performance on the new spatial imagery task with scores from the Paper Folding test, Paper Form Board test, Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices, and object imagery questionnaires.

Main Results:

  • Increased task precision led to longer scanning times and more errors, indicating a reliance on mental image accuracy.
  • Results were replicated under conditions controlling for potential biases.
  • The new spatial imagery measure showed significant correlations with standardized spatial tests (Paper Folding, Paper Form Board, Raven's Matrices).
  • No significant correlation was found between the spatial imagery measure and object-based mental imagery questionnaires.

Conclusions:

  • The novel image-scanning paradigm effectively measures individual differences in spatial mental imagery for location.
  • The findings provide evidence that classical spatial tests rely on spatial mental imagery, not object mental imagery.
  • This research offers a new tool for cognitive research and assessment of spatial abilities.