Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Global Climate Change01:50

Global Climate Change

Throughout its ~4.5 billion year history, the Earth has experienced periods of warming and cooling. However, the current drastic increase in global temperatures is well outside of the Earth’s cyclic norms, and evidence for human-caused global climate change is compelling. Paleoclimatology, the study of ancient climate conditions, provides ample evidence for human-caused global climate change by comparing recent conditions with those in the past.
What is Climate?01:16

What is Climate?

Climate refers to the prevailing weather conditions in a specific area over an extended period. As the saying goes, “Climate is what you expect. Weather is what you get.” Climate is influenced by geographic factors, such as latitude, terrain, and proximity to bodies of water.
Microbes and Climate Change01:27

Microbes and Climate Change

Microorganisms are pivotal agents in Earth's biogeochemical cycles, significantly influencing climate dynamics through their metabolic activities. These microbes modulate the levels of key greenhouse gases by both contributing to and helping mitigate climate change.Microbial Contributions to Greenhouse Gas EmissionsRising global temperatures accelerate microbial metabolism, which, in turn, speeds up the decomposition of organic matter. This process releases carbon dioxide (CO₂) through...
The Carbon Cycle01:14

The Carbon Cycle

Carbon is the basis of all organic matter on Earth, and is recycled through the ecosystem in two primary processes: one in which carbon is exchanged among living organisms, and one in which carbon is cycled over long periods of time through fossilized organic remains, weathering of rocks, and volcanic activity. Human activities, including increased agricultural practices and the burning of fossil fuels, has greatly affected the balance of the natural carbon cycle.
What is Weather?01:07

What is Weather?

Overview
Environmental Influences on Intelligence01:29

Environmental Influences on Intelligence

Despite the strong genetic influence on traits like intelligence, environmental factors significantly shape outcomes. For example, while over 90% of height variation is due to genetic differences, environmental factors such as nutrition also have a notable impact. Similarly, for intelligence, changes in a child's surroundings can significantly alter their IQ. Research shows that enriched environments boost children's academic success and help them develop key cognitive skills. Children from...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mechanisms and scales in modeling forest responses to changing disturbance regimes.

The New phytologist·2026
Same author

Lack of Hydraulic Acclimation in Response to Multiple Droughts and Recovery.

Plant, cell & environment·2026
Same author

Forest carbon protocols underestimate climate-driven carbon loss risks.

Nature·2026
Same author

A Global Comparison of Direct and Legacy Effects of Drought on Ecosystem Productivity.

Ecology letters·2026
Same author

The weak land carbon sink hypothesis.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Towards more effective nature-based climate solutions in global forests.

Nature·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions
06:10

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions

Published on: March 31, 2023

Expert credibility in climate change.

William R L Anderegg1, James W Prall, Jacob Harold

  • 1Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. anderegg@stanford.edu

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|June 23, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Over 97% of publishing climate scientists agree on human-caused climate change (ACC). Researchers unconvinced of ACC have significantly less scientific expertise and prominence than those who agree.

More Related Videos

Simulating Temperature in a Soil Incubation Experiment
08:39

Simulating Temperature in a Soil Incubation Experiment

Published on: October 28, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions
06:10

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions

Published on: March 31, 2023

Simulating Temperature in a Soil Incubation Experiment
08:39

Simulating Temperature in a Soil Incubation Experiment

Published on: October 28, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Climate science
  • Environmental science
  • Atmospheric science

Background:

  • Public perception of climate change differs from scientific consensus.
  • Previous estimates of scientific agreement on anthropogenic climate change (ACC) are based on limited data.
  • A comprehensive analysis of climate scientist expertise and agreement is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the level of scientific consensus on ACC among actively publishing climate researchers.
  • To assess the relative expertise and prominence of scientists with dissenting views on ACC.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of publication and citation data for 1,372 climate researchers.
  • Evaluation of researcher prominence based on scientific output and impact.
  • Comparison of expertise levels between scientists supporting and questioning ACC.

Main Results:

  • 97-98% of actively publishing climate researchers support the tenets of ACC.
  • Climate researchers unconvinced of ACC possess substantially lower scientific expertise and prominence.
  • The findings align with established scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change.

Conclusions:

  • There is an overwhelming consensus among actively publishing climate scientists regarding ACC.
  • The scientific credibility of dissenting voices in climate science is significantly lower.
  • This study reinforces the robust scientific agreement on the causes of climate change.