Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

ECG Interpretation of Rhythms01:24

ECG Interpretation of Rhythms

An electrocardiogram (ECG)graphically represents the heart's electrical activity on ECG paper or a monitor.
Components of the Electrocardiogram
The primary components of a normal ECG waveform in Normal sinus rhythm(NSR) include the P wave, PR interval, QRS complex, ST segment, T wave, and occasionally a U wave.
ECG waveforms are divided by vertical and horizontal lines at standard intervals.
The horizontal axis measures time and rate, and the vertical axis measures amplitude or voltage. When...
Pulse rhythm01:30

Pulse rhythm

Pulse rhythm refers to the pattern of pulsations within specific intervals, offering valuable insights into the regularity or irregularity of the heart's beats as observed through the pattern of pulsation within specific intervals. A regular pulse exhibits a consistent heart rate with uniform waveforms and pulsation force, variations of which can be classified as normal, weak, or bounding.
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Brain Waves01:23

Brain Waves

Brain waves are electrical signals generated by the neurons in the brain, which are regularly monitored to measure mental activities. Brain waves and their frequency ranges can be measured using an electroencephalogram or EEG. There are four main types of brain waves, each with distinct characteristics:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP): A review of applications in cognitive and clinical neuroscience and neural engineering.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Music processing in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a functional MRI study.

Brain communications·2026
Same author

Movement Sonification Types and Triggers: A Systematic Review.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same author

Assessing technologies in dementia care: A conceptual health-economic model.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026
Same author

Personalized Interactive Music Systems for Physical Activity and Exercise: Exploratory Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JMIR human factors·2025
Same author

Editorial: The role of code-modulated evoked potentials in next-generation brain-computer interfacing.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
09:04

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

Decomposing rhythm processing: electroencephalography of perceived and self-imposed rhythmic patterns.

Rebecca S Schaefer1, Rutger J Vlek, Peter Desain

  • 1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognition, Radboud University, Montessorilaan 3, 6525 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. r.schaefer@donders.ru.nl

Psychological Research
|June 25, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals that both perceived and internally generated musical rhythms share common brain processes. Event-related potentials (ERPs) show top-down cognitive functions significantly influence rhythm perception, even without external cues.

More Related Videos

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development
11:50

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development

Published on: April 9, 2014

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks
09:04

Uncovering Beat Deafness: Detecting Rhythm Disorders with Synchronized Finger Tapping and Perceptual Timing Tasks

Published on: March 16, 2015

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development
11:50

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development

Published on: April 9, 2014

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Perception

Background:

  • Musical rhythm perception involves attentional chunking based on accent patterns.
  • Rhythmic structures can be internally generated by imposing subjective accents on stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the event-related potential (ERP) signatures of actual and subjective accents.
  • To differentiate low-level perceptual processes from cognitive aspects of rhythm processing.
  • To isolate common cerebral mechanisms in perceiving and self-generating rhythmic patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by accented and unaccented auditory stimuli.
  • Application of principal component analysis (PCA) to decompose ERPs into subcomponents.
  • Comparison of ERP signatures for externally perceived versus internally generated rhythmic patterns.

Main Results:

  • Distinct ERP differences were observed between accented and unaccented events.
  • Unaccented events exhibited internal structure, distinguishable via ERP analysis.
  • Principal component analysis revealed common subcomponents for perceived and self-generated rhythms.

Conclusions:

  • Top-down cognitive processes play a significant role in the neural mechanisms of rhythm processing.
  • These top-down processes are active even when rhythm is self-generated, independent of external stimuli.
  • The study disentangles perceptual and cognitive contributions to auditory rhythm perception.