Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Concepts and Prototypes

Concepts and Prototypes

The human nervous system handles vast amounts of information by translating sensory stimuli into neural impulses, which the brain processes, creating thoughts expressed through language or stored as memories. The brain also synthesizes information from emotions and memories, which significantly influence thoughts and behaviors. This intricate process creates a comprehensive mental picture.
The brain organizes this information using concepts, which are mental categories grouping linguistic data,...

Natural and Artificial Concepts

Natural and Artificial Concepts

In psychology, concepts can be divided into two categories: natural and artificial. Natural concepts are formed through direct or indirect experiences. For example, consider the concept of snow. If you live in a place with regular snowfall, such as Essex Junction, Vermont, you know snow through direct experiences. You’ve seen it fall, touched it, shoveled it, and played in it. You recognize its texture, appearance, and even its smell. In contrast, if you live on an island like Saint Vincent in...

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws

Dimensional Analysis

Dimensional Analysis

Dimensional analysis is a powerful tool that is used in physics and engineering to understand and predict the behavior of physical systems. The basic idea behind dimensional analysis is to express physical quantities in terms of fundamental dimensions such as the mass, length, and time. Derived dimensions like the velocity, acceleration, and force are derived from the combinations of these fundamental dimensions.
Dimensional analysis allows us to analyze and compare physical quantities on a...

Dimensional Analysis

Dimensional Analysis

The concept of dimension is important because every mathematical equation linking physical quantities must be dimensionally consistent, implying that mathematical equations must meet the following two rules. The first rule is that, in an equation, the expressions on each side of the equal sign must have the same dimensions. This is fairly intuitive since we can only add or subtract quantities of the same type (dimension). The second rule states that, in an equation, the arguments of any of the...

Dimensional Analysis

Dimensional Analysis

Dimensional analysis, also known as the factor label method, is a versatile approach for mathematical operations. The main principle behind this approach is: the units of quantities must be subjected to the same mathematical operations as their associated numbers. This method can be applied to computations ranging from simple unit conversions to more complex and multi-step calculations involving several different quantities and their units.
Conversion Factors and Dimensional Analysis
The unit...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Genomic prostate score and treatment selection in favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

BJUI compass·2025

Same author

Biomarker discovery using machine learning in the psychosis spectrum.

Biomarkers in neuropsychiatry·2024

Same author

Measuring the efficacy of Serenoa repens (USPlus) extract with mobile uroflowmetry.

The Canadian journal of urology·2024

Same author

Concepts, core knowledge, and the rationalism-empiricism debate.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2024

Same author

Validation of an algorithm for sound-based voided volume estimation.

Scientific reports·2024

Same author

Making sense of domain specificity.

Cognition·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

Concepts and theoretical unification.

Eric Margolis¹, Stephen Laurence

¹Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada. margolis@interchange.ubc.ca

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

|June 30, 2010

Summary

This study introduces a novel framework for understanding concepts as mental symbols with semantic and processing structures. This approach unifies diverse disciplines and avoids issues associated with eliminativism in concept theory.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 11, 2026

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models

Published on: November 15, 2013

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Philosophy of Mind
Linguistics

Background:

Existing theories of concepts struggle to unify diverse disciplinary perspectives.
Machery's eliminativist approach faces challenges in explaining co-referentiality across different concept types.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a unified framework for understanding mental concepts.
To provide a theoretical foundation that accommodates varied conceptual processes.
To address limitations in current concept theory, particularly eliminativism.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of mental symbols.
Examination of semantic and processing structures of concepts.
Comparative analysis with existing theories, including Machery's eliminativism.

Main Results:

Concepts are defined as mental symbols possessing both semantic and processing structures.
This dual-structure approach facilitates interdisciplinary convergence on the study of concepts.
The framework successfully accommodates diverse conceptual processes and resolves issues of co-referentiality.

Conclusions:

A unified theory of concepts, based on semantic and processing structures, offers a robust alternative to eliminativist accounts.
This approach enhances theoretical unification across cognitive science and philosophy.
The proposed model provides a more comprehensive explanation for the nature and function of concepts.