Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Parental attitudes toward ethical and social issues surrounding the expansion of newborn screening using new
L E Hasegawa1, K A Fergus, N Ojeda
1Hawaii Genetics Program, Children with Special Needs Branch, Hawaii Department of Health, Honolulu, Hawaii 96816, USA. ianne@hawaiigenetics.org
Insights
Parents desire prenatal education on newborn screening (NBS) and support it for treatable infant conditions. However, they express concerns regarding NBS for untreatable or late-onset disorders.
Area of Science:
- Genetics and Public Health
- Pediatric Medicine
- Bioethics
Background:
- Newborn screening (NBS) is a public health program for early detection of treatable congenital disorders.
- Parental understanding and attitudes towards NBS, particularly for conditions without immediate treatment or with late onset, are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess parental knowledge and attitudes regarding newborn screening (NBS).
- To explore parent perspectives on NBS for untreatable conditions, late-onset disorders, and informed consent.
- To identify discrepancies between parent views and professional consensus on NBS policies.
Main Methods:
- Seventeen qualitative focus groups were conducted with mothers of young children across four US states.
- Participants were mothers of children 10 years old or younger.
Main Results:
- Most mothers did not recall receiving NBS information and desired it prenatally.
- A majority found the 'informed dissent' process adequate if informed prior to delivery.
- Support was high for NBS of treatable infant conditions, but divided for untreatable or late-onset disorders.
Conclusions:
- Parental attitudes on NBS timing, informed consent, and screening for untreatable/late-onset conditions differ from many professional viewpoints.
- Further research into parental opinions on expanded NBS and their inclusion in policy development is crucial.
Aims:
This study assessed parent knowledge of newborn screening (NBS) and parent attitudes toward NBS for untreatable conditions, NBS for late-onset disorders and informed consent in NBS.
Methods:
Seventeen qualitative focus groups were held in Alaska, California, Hawaii, and Washington with mothers of children 10 years old or younger.
Results:
Most participants did not recall receiving information about NBS, and all wanted this information prenatally. In addition, most felt that the current system of 'informed dissent' was adequate, provided they were told about NBS prior to delivery. All women supported NBS for conditions that occur in infancy without a proven treatment. However, they disagreed about NBS for disorders that manifest in late childhood or adulthood.
Conclusions:
The results show a general consensus among the focus group participants about issues that cause dissent among public health and health care professionals. Parent attitudes differ from those of many professional communities with regard to timing of NBS education, informed consent, NBS for disorders that lack an effective treatment, and predictive testing of children for late-onset disorders. The results highlight the need to further research parent opinions about expanded NBS using new technologies and to include parents in the development of NBS policies.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
CRISPR
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Standards of Care II
What is Genetic Engineering?

