Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
Anatomy of the Ear01:16

Anatomy of the Ear

Auditory sensation, commonly called hearing, involves the transformation of sonic waves into neural impulses facilitated by the structures of the auditory organ. The prominent, flesh-like structure on the side of the head, called the auricle, directs sound waves towards the auditory canal. The auricle is often mislabeled as the pinna, a term more aligned with mobile structures like a feline's external ear. The auditory canal penetrates the cranium via the external auditory meatus of the...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Hearing01:31

Hearing

When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same frequency...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Synchronization of two active ears via binaural coupling.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

How Exceptional Is the Ear?

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2025
Same author

Auditory cellular cooperativity probed via spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Biophysical journal·2025
Same author

Otoacoustic emissions but not behavioral measurements predict cochlear-nerve frequency tuning in an avian vocal-communication specialist.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

WHAT MAKES HUMAN HEARING SPECIAL?

Frontiers for young minds·2023
Same author

Overtone focusing in biphonic tuvan throat singing.

eLife·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea
09:54

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea

Published on: May 10, 2019

Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Christopher Bergevin1, David S Velenovsky, Kevin E Bonine

  • 1Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA. dolemitecb@gmail.com

Biophysical Journal
|August 18, 2010
PubMed
Summary

The tectorial membrane (TM) aids auditory tuning in lizards, with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) revealing sharper tuning in species with a TM. Additional factors influence tuning even without a TM.

More Related Videos

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea
09:54

Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Ribbon Synapses at Specific Frequency Regions of the Mouse Cochlea

Published on: May 10, 2019

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Auditory biophysics
  • Comparative anatomy
  • Bioacoustics

Background:

  • The tectorial membrane (TM) is crucial for auditory function, potentially enhancing mechanical tuning by overcoming viscous forces.
  • Lizards offer a unique model for studying the TM due to diverse inner-ear morphologies.
  • Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) noninvasively measure auditory frequency selectivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To estimate auditory tuning in 12 lizard species with varying TM morphology using SFOAEs.
  • To investigate the relationship between TM presence/morphology and auditory tuning.
  • To explore micromechanical factors influencing auditory tuning in lizards.

Main Methods:

  • Measurement of low-level SFOAEs in 12 lizard species.
  • Analysis of SFOAE delay estimates to infer auditory tuning.
  • Comparison of tuning characteristics across species with and without a TM.

Main Results:

  • SFOAEs were measurable in all tested lizard ears, including those without a TM.
  • Species with a TM generally exhibited longer delays and sharper tuning compared to those without.
  • Anolis lizards (no TM) showed long delays, indicating other micromechanical tuning factors.
  • A continuous TM in Aspidoscelis correlated with intermediate delays, suggesting complex macromechanical roles.

Conclusions:

  • The tectorial membrane plays a role in auditory tuning in lizards, generally sharpening frequency selectivity.
  • Micromechanical factors beyond the TM significantly influence auditory tuning.
  • Lizard auditory research provides insights into fundamental vertebrate auditory principles, despite differences with mammalian systems.