Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Sound Waves: Interference00:53

Sound Waves: Interference

Sound waves can be modeled either as longitudinal waves, wherein the molecules of the medium oscillate around an equilibrium position, or as pressure waves. When two identical waves from the same source superimpose on each other, the combination of two crests or two troughs results in amplitude reinforcement known as constructive interference. If two identical waves, that are initially in phase, become out of phase because of different path lengths, the combination of crests with troughs...
Effects of feedback01:24

Effects of feedback

Feedback in control systems plays a critical role in shaping various operational parameters, extending beyond simple error reduction to influence stability, bandwidth, gain, impedance, and sensitivity. Understanding these effects requires examining a basic feedback system characterized by defined input, output, error, and feedback signals.
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement (NOE)01:06

Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement (NOE)

Irradiation of a spin-active nucleus causes an increase or decrease in the signal intensity of neighboring nuclei that are not necessarily chemically bonded or involved in J-coupling. This phenomenon, called the nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE), results from through-space interactions between the nuclear spins. The NOE effect decreases with increasing internuclear distance and is generally not observed beyond 4 angstroms. In NOE, dipole-dipole interactions between neighboring spin-active...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptual learning in ADHD.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Random Tree Model of Meaningful Memory.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Large-scale study of human memory for meaningful narratives.

Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Generalization in perceptual learning across stimuli and tasks.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Corrigendum to "Motion-induced blindness as a noisy excitable system" [Vis. Res. 216 (2024) 108363].

Vision research·2024
Same author

Motion-induced blindness as a noisy excitable system.

Vision research·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Lateral facilitation--no effect on the target noise level.

Mikhail Katkov1, Dov Sagi

  • 1Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA. mikhail.katkov@gmail.com

Vision Research
|August 31, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Lateral facilitation enhances visual target detection by increasing signal response, not by reducing internal noise. This finding supports signal enhancement models over uncertainty-based explanations for improved perception.

More Related Videos

Stochastic Noise Application for the Assessment of Medial Vestibular Nucleus Neuron Sensitivity In Vitro
06:22

Stochastic Noise Application for the Assessment of Medial Vestibular Nucleus Neuron Sensitivity In Vitro

Published on: August 28, 2019

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2026

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Stochastic Noise Application for the Assessment of Medial Vestibular Nucleus Neuron Sensitivity In Vitro
06:22

Stochastic Noise Application for the Assessment of Medial Vestibular Nucleus Neuron Sensitivity In Vitro

Published on: August 28, 2019

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training
07:05

A Protocol for the Administration of Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback Training

Published on: August 24, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Vision science
  • Perceptual psychology
  • Computational neuroscience

Background:

  • Lateral facilitation, observed as reduced detection thresholds for Gabor targets with aligned flankers, is a known visual phenomenon.
  • Previous explanations for lateral facilitation have included both signal enhancement and reduced internal noise (variability).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether lateral facilitation arises from signal enhancement or decreased internal noise.
  • To apply a Signal Detection Theory (SDT)-based contrast-identification paradigm to analyze the underlying mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Signal Detection Theory (SDT) framework with a contrast-identification paradigm.
  • Analyzed the impact of aligned, high-contrast Gabor flankers on the detection threshold of a central Gabor target.

Main Results:

  • Flankers did not alter internal noise levels.
  • Collinear flankers increased the target's response, consistent with lateral facilitation.
  • Results indicated that lateral facilitation is driven by signal enhancement.

Conclusions:

  • Lateral facilitation in visual perception is solely attributable to signal enhancement.
  • Uncertainty-based models do not adequately explain the observed data on lateral facilitation.