Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Domain effects and financial risk attitudes.
Ivo Vlaev1, Petko Kusev, Neil Stewart
1Division of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, W2 1NY, UK. i.vlaev@imperial.ac.uk
Financial risk preferences depend on context, not just potential gains or losses. Risk perception varies across different financial domains, challenging traditional gender-based assumptions about risk aversion.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Decision Science
Background:
- Risk attitudes can be influenced by how choices are framed (e.g., gains vs. losses).
- Previous research indicates context-dependent risk perception, but direct exploration across diverse financial domains is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if financial risk preferences are influenced by the specific financial domain of the choice.
- To identify underlying factors driving context-dependent risk perceptions in financial decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Participants evaluated identical gambles presented within seven distinct financial domains.
- Factor analysis was employed to identify patterns in risk perception across these domains.
Main Results:
- Three factors explained 68.6% of the variance in risk perception: Positive (opportunity, pension, salary), Positive-Complex (investments, mortgage), and Negative (loss, insurance).
- Significant context effects on risk perception were observed across the seven financial scenarios.
- The study did not confirm the assumption of higher risk aversion in women within this context structure, noting potential gender variance limitations in student populations.
Conclusions:
- Financial risk attitude is context-dependent, with distinct factors influencing perception across different domains.
- These findings highlight the importance of considering situational context in financial decision-making models.
- The results challenge generalized assumptions about risk aversion, particularly gender-based ones, suggesting a more nuanced, context-specific understanding is needed.
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Attitudes
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions
Equity Theory
Attachment Styles