Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 8, 2026
An Ex Vivo Porcine Model for Hydrodynamic Testing of Experimental Aortic Valve Procedures and Novel Medical Devices
Published on: August 25, 2023
The changing hydrodynamic performance of the decellularized intact porcine aortic root: considerations on in-vitro
Tomaso Bottio1, Vincenzo Tarzia, Carlo Dal Lin
1Cardiovascular Institute, University of Padova, Italy. tbottio@gmail.com
Background And Aim Of The Study:
The most effective method for decellularization of the intact porcine aortic root remains controversial. Additionally, the hydrodynamic effect that such treatment may have on aortic roots has never been previously investigated. The study aim was to compare the in-vitro hydrodynamic performances of intact porcine aortic roots, both before and after decellularization treatment.
Methods:
Fifteen fresh porcine aortic roots were tested in the aortic chamber of the Sheffield pulse duplicator (SPD). For study purposes, the roots were first sutured to a silicone aortic root and then hydrodynamically tested. After in-vitro testing, the fresh porcine aortic roots, while still fixed within the silicone root, were decellularized according to various protocols (TRI-COL, TRI-DOC, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) 0.03%, and SDS 0.1%). After decellularization, the valve roots were re-tested, adopting identical testing conditions. Forward flow pressure drop, closing leakage volumes, effective orifice area (EOA), and stroke work loss were each monitored. Three roots, used as a control group, were tested in identical fashion before and after storage (without decellularization) for comparative purposes.
Results:
The TRI-COL- and TRI-DOC-treated porcine aortic roots showed significantly lower transvalvular gradients, lower stroke work loss, lower valve resistance, and higher EOA than fresh intact porcine roots. In contrast, SDS 0.1%-treated porcine aortic roots showed opposing results, with the transvalvular gradients, stroke work loss and valve resistance each higher, and the EOA lower, than pre-treatment values. SDS 0.03% treatment had no significant effect on the hydrodynamic performance. After decellularization in all treatment groups, the diastolic parameters, total regurgitant volume and valve closing volume were each non-significantly increased. The aortic roots used as a control group showed similar results before and after storage.
Conclusion:
Based on these results using the SPD, all treatments except for SDS 0.03% modified the systolic and diastolic functions of intact porcine aortic roots.
