Interpersonal sensitivity, status, and stereotype accuracy
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
David A Kenny1, Amanda Snook, Eliane M Boucher
1University of Connecticut, Department of Psychology, 406 Babbidge Rd., Unit 1020, Storrs, CT 06269-1020, USA. david.kenny@uconn.edu
Abstract:
A classic question in social and organizational psychology is whether low-status persons are more accurate in the perception of their high-status partners than the latter are in their perception of their subordinates. In a series of studies, Snodgrass (1985, 1992) tested this idea. She found that subordinates were more accurate at judging how their bosses viewed them than bosses were at judging how their subordinates viewed them, but that bosses were more accurate at judging how subordinates viewed themselves than subordinates were at judging how bosses viewed themselves. We believe, however, that these results were obscured by stereotype accuracy. Using previously collected data, we found that stereotype accuracy does lead to the pattern previously observed by Snodgrass. We also discovered that when we controlled for stereotype accuracy, subordinates' perceptions were generally more accurate than those of their bosses, which supports Snodgrass's original hypothesis.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Content Model
Implicit Personality Theories
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Social Identity
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Factors Influencing Attraction VI: Personality Traits

