Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions01:22

Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions

Two primary types of muscle contractions are isotonic and isometric, each serving unique functions and involving distinct mechanisms. Both isotonic and isometric contractions are integral to the body's complex system of movement and stability. Isotonic exercises contribute significantly to functional strength and movement, while isometric contractions are crucial for maintaining posture and joint stability.
Isotonic contractions
Isotonic contractions occur when a muscle changes length while the...
Static Equilibrium - II01:07

Static Equilibrium - II

Static equilibrium is a special case in mechanics that is very important in everyday life. It occurs when the net force and the net torque on an object or system are both zero. This means that both the linear and angular accelerations are zero. Thus, the object is at rest, or its center of mass is moving at a constant velocity. However, this does not mean that no forces are acting on the object within the system. In fact, there are very few scenarios on Earth in which no forces are acting upon...
Constraints and Statical Determinacy01:26

Constraints and Statical Determinacy

In structural engineering, the equilibrium of a system is not only determined by its equations of equilibrium but also with the help of constraints. Constraints refer to restrictions on the motion of a system. The proper combinations of constraints can minimize the total number of constraints needed to maintain a system in mechanical equilibrium. When this happens, the system is said to be statically determinate. For such systems, the unknown reaction supports can be estimated using equilibrium...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accuracy of visual estimation in classifying effort during a lifting task.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2011
Same author

Isometric strength assessment, Part II: Static testing does not accurately classify validity of effort.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2010
Same author

Simultaneous bilateral hand strength testing in a client population, Part II: Relationship to a distraction-based lifting evaluation.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2010
Same author

Simultaneous bilateral hand strength testing in a client population, part I: diagnostic, observational and subjective complaint correlates to consistency of effort.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2010

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
07:30

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations

Published on: May 1, 2018

Isometric strength assessment, part I: static testing does not accurately predict dynamic lifting capacity.

Larry Feeler1, James D St James, Darrell W Schapmire

  • 1lfeeler@grandecom.net

Work (Reading, Mass.)
|October 28, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Isometric strength tests do not accurately predict dynamic lifting capacity. These static strength measures are unreliable for practical applications, raising safety concerns for workplace assessments.

More Related Videos

Induction and Assessment of Exertional Skeletal Muscle Damage in Humans
08:33

Induction and Assessment of Exertional Skeletal Muscle Damage in Humans

Published on: December 11, 2016

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
06:36

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

Published on: April 15, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
07:30

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations

Published on: May 1, 2018

Induction and Assessment of Exertional Skeletal Muscle Damage in Humans
08:33

Induction and Assessment of Exertional Skeletal Muscle Damage in Humans

Published on: December 11, 2016

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
06:36

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

Published on: April 15, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Biomechanics
  • Ergonomics

Background:

  • Static strength testing is commonly used in employment settings.
  • The validity of using isometric strength to predict dynamic lifting capacity is debated.
  • Previous research has raised concerns about the safety and accuracy of such predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the predictive accuracy of isometric (static) strength tests for dynamic lifting capacity.
  • To determine if static strength measures are reliable for assessing an individual's ability to perform dynamic lifting tasks.

Main Methods:

  • A large cohort of 107,755 males and 23,078 females participated in post-offer employment testing.
  • Participants underwent standardized testing for three isometric strength measures.
  • Physical maxima were recorded for four different dynamic lifting tasks.

Main Results:

  • Modest correlations were observed between isometric and dynamic strength measures.
  • However, the standard errors of estimate for all isometric-to-dynamic predictions were too large to be practically meaningful.
  • The predictive value of static tests for dynamic lifting was found to be insufficient for common applications.

Conclusions:

  • Static Leg Lift, Static Arm Lift, and Static Back (Torso) Lift tests are not appropriate for predicting dynamic lifting capacity.
  • The significant error margins associated with these predictions provide objective evidence to question their use.
  • Employers, clinicians, and risk managers should reconsider the reliance on static strength testing due to potential inaccuracies and safety implications.