Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility of using two generative AI models for teeth reconstruction.

Journal of dentistry·2024
Same author

Development of a new critical size defect model in the paranasal sinus and first approach for defect reconstruction-An in vivo maxillary bone defect study in sheep.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine·2022
Same author

A fully ingrowing implant for cranial reconstruction: Results in critical size defects in sheep using 3D-printed titanium scaffold.

Biomaterials advances·2022
Same author

Interdisciplinary management of skull base surgery.

Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research·2021
Same author

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the mandible: an unusual presentation and treatment.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2020
Same author

Retrospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of free flap monitoring with the Cook-Swartz-Doppler probe in head and neck reconstruction.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2019
Same journal

Surgical management of congenital maxillo-mandibular bony fusion (syngnathia): Technical insights from a three-case retrospective series.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026
Same journal

Masseter microvascular perfusion after minimally invasive sagittal split ramus osteotomy: A long-term split-mouth study.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026
Same journal

Traumatic retrobulbar hematoma: a European multicenter study.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026
Same journal

Double-layer versus conventional mucoperiosteal flap closure in the surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: A combined Retrospective-Prospective cohort study.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026
Same journal

Engagement is not encoding: Outcome alignment determines the effectiveness of mixed reality in medical education.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026
Same journal

Dynamic navigation combined with guide plate-assisted immediate implantation in the posterior maxillary region through the zygomatic bone.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin
09:36

Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin

Published on: March 14, 2018

Morphometric analysis - Cone beam computed tomography to predict bone quality and quantity.

B Hohlweg-Majert1, M C Metzger, T Kummer

  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675 München, Germany.

Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery : Official Publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery
|October 30, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can quantify jaw bone mass but does not assess bone quality. Modified quantitative CT methods are needed for a comprehensive analysis of bone characteristics.

More Related Videos

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects
08:39

Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects

Published on: June 24, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin
09:36

Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin

Published on: March 14, 2018

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects
08:39

Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects

Published on: June 24, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Dental imaging
  • Radiology
  • Biomaterials

Background:

  • Quantitative computed tomography (CT) is used for bone quality and mass assessment.
  • Cone-beam CT (CBCT) is a common dental imaging modality.
  • Evaluating CBCT's ability to assess bone characteristics is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if CBCT can detect bone quantity and quality.
  • To compare CBCT with other CT methods for bone analysis.
  • To establish the utility of CBCT in quantitative bone assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Siemens and Comac phantoms to create calibration curves for CT and CBCT.
  • Assessed spatial relationships of bone cylinders and pig skull samples using 3D visualization software.
  • Calculated a correction factor for CBCT imaging.

Main Results:

  • Both CT and CBCT demonstrated a linear correlation between Hounsfield Units and bone morphology.
  • A correction factor was successfully calculated for CBCT.
  • Micro CT was necessary for detailed analysis of bone micromorphology.

Conclusions:

  • CBCT is effective for analyzing bone mass in the jaw.
  • CBCT does not provide information regarding bone quality.
  • Further research may be needed to combine CBCT with other methods for complete bone assessment.