Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Defining quality criteria for online continuing medical education modules using modified nominal group technique
S E D Shortt1, Jean-Marc Guillemette, Anne Marie Duncan
1Knowledge Transfer & Practice Policy, Canadian Medical Association, Ottawa, ON, Canada. sam.shortt@cma.ca
Defining quality criteria for online continuing medical education (CME) is crucial. Experts identified 10 essential criteria for accredited online CME modules, emphasizing needs-based, evidence-based, and interactive content.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Digital Health
- Quality Improvement
Background:
- Physician continuing education increasingly utilizes online platforms.
- There is a growing need to establish quality standards for accredited online medical modules.
- Accredited online continuing medical education (CME) is rapidly expanding.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define essential quality criteria for accredited online CME modules.
- To achieve consensus among experts on key attributes of high-quality online learning for physicians.
- To compare expert-defined criteria with practitioner perspectives.
Main Methods:
- A Modified Nominal Group Technique (MNGT) consensus process was employed.
- Canadian CME directors and academic researchers participated.
- Expert rankings were compared against a survey of Canadian Medical Association (CMA) members.
Main Results:
- Experts identified 10 primary quality criteria for online CME modules.
- Key criteria include being needs-based, clinical, evidence-based, interactive, facilitating practice change, accessible for review, and having robust evaluation.
- Practitioners showed less consensus on criteria and did not prioritize assessing performance change.
Conclusions:
- Ten quality criteria for accredited online CME modules were identified by Canadian experts.
- A discrepancy exists between expert recommendations and practitioner preferences regarding the assessment of change.
- Further research is needed to understand physician preference for traditional CME formats over practice-change documentation.
Related Concept Videos
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains for...
