Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026
Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: September 13, 2022
Risk factors for surgical failure after posterior intravaginal slingplasty: a case series
Huey-Yi Chen1, Ming Ho, Yin-Yi Chang
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, China Medical University Hospital, Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. d888208@ms45.hinet.net
Objective:
The goal of this study was to analyze the potential risk factors of surgical failure after posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.
Study Design:
Women with symptomatic uterine or vaginal vault prolapse that extended to or beyond the introitus were eligible for inclusion. Each woman underwent a detailed history taking and a vaginal examination for staging of pelvic organ prolapse before treatment. Follow-up evaluations were at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after the operation. Surgical failure is defined as the presence of symptomatic uterine or vaginal vault prolapse ≧stage 2 (higher than 0, at the hymen) after posterior intravaginal slingplasty.
Results:
The surgical failure rate (8/61) following posterior intravaginal slingplasty was 13.1%. Using univariable logistic regression, C or D point stage IV before surgery was significantly associated with surgical failure of posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse. Complications (11/61=18%) included vaginal erosion (9.8%), blood loss over 500 ml (4.9%), and perineal pain (3.3%).
Conclusion:
Procidentia is a significant risk factor for surgical failure of posterior intravaginal slingplasty, and therefore this procedure should never be used alone in patients with complete uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.