Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

07:29
Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
Published on: November 12, 2015
Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking using Ocular Response Analyzer software.
Eberhard Spoerl1, Naim Terai, Freia Scholz
1Department of Ophthalmology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden, Germany. eberhard.spoerl@uniklinikum-dresden.de
Journal of Refractive Surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)
|January 20, 2011
Summary
Corneal cross-linking (CXL) alters biomechanical properties in keratoconus. New Ocular Response Analyzer software reveals the area under peak 2 parameter is more sensitive than corneal hysteresis or resistance factor in detecting these changes.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Corneal Science
Background:
- Keratoconus is a progressive corneal ectasia characterized by structural weakness.
- Corneal cross-linking (CXL) aims to stiffen the cornea and halt disease progression.
- Assessing biomechanical changes post-CXL is crucial for evaluating treatment efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate biomechanical changes in keratoconic corneas after corneal cross-linking (CXL).
- To evaluate the utility of new Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) software parameters in detecting these changes.
- To compare post-CXL biomechanical properties with healthy controls.
Main Methods:
- Utilized ORA software (version 2.04) to obtain 37 new biomechanical parameters from 50 keratoconic eyes before and 1 year after CXL.
- Compared measurements with 96 age-matched healthy control eyes.
- Analyzed changes in corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF).
Main Results:
- Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) showed no significant change after CXL.
- The area under peak 2 (p2area) significantly increased by 35% (P=.001) 1 year post-CXL.
- A significant negative correlation was found between p2area and the difference in CH-CRF values (r=-0.29, P=.001).
Conclusions:
- The area under peak 2 (p2area) is a more sensitive indicator of biomechanical changes post-CXL than CH or CRF alone.
- Corneal biomechanics are altered after CXL in keratoconus patients.
- Post-CXL corneas exhibit biomechanical properties distinct from healthy corneas.
