Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
SBAR II: Application of SBAR01:14

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predicting Attrition in a Statewide Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Training Program.

Journal of continuing education in nursing·2026
Same author

Improving the Appropriate Prescribing of Olanzapine for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Quality Improvement Initiative for the Outpatient Oncology Practice.

Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology·2025
Same author

"I'm Just Trying to Squeeze in Hours Here and There": New SANEs' Perspectives on Challenges Gaining Practice Experience.

Journal of forensic nursing·2025
Same author

Quality Improvement Summit 2016: Shared Decision Making and Prostate Cancer Screening.

Urology practice·2023
Same author

Response to commentary Beyond "patient-provider race matching." Black midwives clarify a vision for race-concordant care to achieve equity in Black perinatal health: A commentary on "Do Black birthing persons prefer a Black health care provider during birth? Race concordance in birth".

Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)·2023
Same author

Type 2 diabetes patient activation and mHealth interventions decreased cardiovascular disease risk.

The American journal of managed care·2022
Same journal

Virga and the future of motivational interviewing: Issues in training counseling skills.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Informed choices: Patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives on high-risk prostate cancer treatment decision-making.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Factors influencing patients switching back to physical channels for health consultations.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Challenges in advising people with severe mental illness to quit smoking: A conversation analysis of patient resistance.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Alleviating the burden: The impact of interpersonal and digital communication on depressive symptoms in cancer survivors.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Are patient goals discussed during treatment decision-making in patients with head and neck cancer? A qualitative content analysis of consultations.

Patient education and counseling·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
04:36

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

Shared Decision Making Guidance Reminders in Practice (SDM-GRIP).

Margaret Holmes-Rovner1, Karen Kelly-Blake, Francesca Dwamena

  • 1Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, C203 East Fee, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI 48824-1316, USA. mholmes@msu.edu

Patient Education and Counseling
|February 2, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The SDM-GRIP system improved shared decision-making (SDM) for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients considering percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While feasible, optimizing patient recruitment for educational visits is key for future implementation.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
04:36

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Clinical Decision Support
  • Patient-Centered Care

Background:

  • Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial for guiding treatment choices in stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
  • Existing systems may not adequately support SDM prior to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate SDM-GRIP (Shared Decision Making Guidance Reminders in Practice), a system to enhance SDM in primary care for CAD patients.
  • To assess the feasibility and reception of SDM-GRIP components before PCI decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Program evaluation of SDM-GRIP, including provider training, decision aids, patient group visits, and SDM provider visits.
  • Assessed participation rates for physician training and patient engagement in group visits and SDM encounters.

Main Results:

  • Physician training participation was high (73%).
  • Patient engagement in group visits (25%) and SDM visits (16%) was lower.
  • 82% of providers used the encounter decision guide during SDM visits; patients valued the program and reimbursement was routine.

Conclusions:

  • SDM-GRIP program elements were well-received and feasible.
  • Low recruitment for educational group visits necessitates implementation adjustments.
  • Future implementation will focus on integrating SDM tools at the point of stress test ordering to improve care coordination.