Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis

The nursing process uses scientific reasoning, problem-solving, and critical thinking to guide nurses in providing patients with appropriate care. This process is a systematic approach to recognize, avoid, and treat current or potential health issues while promoting the patient's well-being.
The nursing process considers the patient's emotional and physical well-being. The process can be repeated or stopped at any point if judged essential. Assessment is the first step in the nursing process.

Communication

Communication

Communication between two animals occurs when one animal transmits an information signal that causes a change in the animal that receives the information. Organisms communicate with one another in a host of different ways. Signals can be auditory, chemical, visual, tactile, or a combination of these. Communication is a critical behavioral adaptation that promotes survival, growth, and reproduction.

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Promoting ethical research practices: perspectives from pediatric populations.

Seminars in speech and language·2011

Same author

Ethical principles associated with the publication of research in ASHA's scholarly journals: importance and adequacy of coverage.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2010

Same author

Research Integrity in Communication Sciences and Disorders.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2010

Same author

Responsible conduct of research in communication sciences and disorders: faculty and student perceptions.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2010

Same author

Reminiscence group activities and discourse interaction in Alzheimer's disease.

Journal of gerontological nursing·2002

Same journal

Age-Related Maturation of Antiphasic Arabic Digits-in-Noise Thresholds in Children.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026

Same journal

Case Studies of Auditory Processing Assessment and Management for Veterans.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026

Same journal

Effect of Acupuncture Combined With Computer-Assisted Cognitive Training on Language and Cognitive Functions in Poststroke Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026

Same journal

Understanding How Older Adults Comprehend Simple Comparative Sentences in a Predicate-Final Language.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026

Same journal

Perception of Synthesized Mandarin Speech Based on a Large-Scale Language Model Among Deaf Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026

Same journal

Measurement Variability of Peak Flow: A Laboratory Experiment Comparing Cough Testing Equipment.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Research integrity in communication sciences and disorders: preface.

Sharon E Moss¹

¹American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, MD, USA. sharon.moss2@va.gov

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR

|February 3, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study examined research integrity education and policies in Communication Sciences and Disorders graduate programs. Findings aim to promote responsible conduct of research (RCR) for scientists and institutions.

More Related Videos

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

Published on: July 31, 2017

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

Published on: July 31, 2017

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

Area of Science:

Communication Sciences and Disorders
Research Integrity

Background:

A joint program sponsored by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Office of Research Integrity promoted examination of responsible conduct of research (RCR) practices and policies.
The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's (ASHA) Research Integrity Grant Group received funding to investigate RCR.

Purpose of the Study:

Identify teaching and learning patterns in graduate Communication Sciences and Disorders programs regarding RCR topics.
Examine perceptions of research integrity concepts within the discipline's scientific journals.
Evaluate ASHA's policies and practices for safeguarding published scientific work.

Main Methods:

Reviewed historical and contemporary literature.
Conducted surveys.
Analyzed ASHA policies.

Main Results:

Identified current practices and perceptions of research integrity in Communication Sciences and Disorders graduate education.
Assessed the alignment of these practices with established RCR principles.
Evaluated the effectiveness of ASHA's existing policies.

Conclusions:

The study provides insights into research integrity education and policy within the field.
Findings aim to inform and inspire scientists, students, institutions, and professional societies to uphold RCR.
Promoting responsible research is crucial for the scientific community in the 21st century and beyond.