Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to the Sign Test01:10

Introduction to the Sign Test

The sign test is an important tool in nonparametric statistics, offering a straightforward yet effective method for analyzing matched pairs, nominal data, or hypotheses concerning the median of a population. It transforms data points into positive or negative signs, avoiding the need for assumptions about data distribution and instead focusing on the direction of change. It is particularly valuable when data does not conform to the normal distribution requirements of many parametric tests. For...
Sign Test for Nominal Data01:12

Sign Test for Nominal Data

The sign test is a nonparametric method used to evaluate hypotheses about the median of a single sample or to compare the medians of two related samples. The sign test is particularly useful when dealing with nominal data, which includes distinct categories without an inherent order, such as names, labels, and preferences. Nominal data restricts statistical analysis to evaluating population proportions rather than mean or median values that require continuous data.
For example, consider a...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Sign Test for Median of Single Population01:20

Sign Test for Median of Single Population

In general, the sign test serves as a nonparametric method to test hypotheses about the median of a single population when the data does not follow a known distribution. This simplicity makes it particularly useful for small sample sizes or when the assumptions of parametric tests cannot be met. The process begins with identifying a null hypothesis, typically stating that the population median equals a specific value. The alternative hypothesis could be that the median is either not equal to,...
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population01:14

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the median of a single population is a nonparametric test used to evaluate whether the median of a population differs from a specified value. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require data to follow a normal distribution, making it suitable for non-normal or small samples. The test begins by calculating the difference (d) between each observation and the hypothesized median. The absolute values of these differences are ranked in ascending order, with ties...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Polypill for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the POLY-HF randomized trial.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Stress and cardiovascular disease: Testing a vigilance pathway in two contemporary theories.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2026
Same author

Monoclonal antibodies targeting PCDH7 inhibit tumor growth and enhance immune responses in <i>KRAS</i>-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Involved nodal versus elective neck radiotherapy (INVERT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective phase II randomized controlled trial protocol.

BMC cancer·2026
Same author

Sample Size Determination for Comparing Slopes in Cluster Randomized Trials With Longitudinal Measurements.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Undetected Weight Loss Associates With Upstaging in Cancer Patients.

Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle·2026
Same journal

An Adaptive Biomarker-based Umbrella Trial Design Using Bayesian Latent Class Model.

Statistics in biopharmaceutical research·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian Adaptive Marker-Stratified Design for Phase II Clinical Trials Using Calibrated Spike-and-Slab priors.

Statistics in biopharmaceutical research·2026
Same journal

On the Two-Step Hybrid Design for Augmenting Randomized Trials Using Real-World Data.

Statistics in biopharmaceutical research·2025
Same journal

Two-stage Adaptive Enrichment Designs with Survival Outcomes and Adjustment for Misclassification in Predictive Biomarkers.

Statistics in biopharmaceutical research·2025
Same journal

A novel longitudinal rank-sum test for multiple primary endpoints in clinical trials: Applications to neurodegenerative disorders.

Statistics in biopharmaceutical research·2025
Same journal

Isotonic Phase I cancer clinical trial design utilizing patient-reported outcomes.

Statistics in biopharmaceutical research·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Sample Size Calculation for Clustered Binary Data with Sign Tests Using Different Weighting Schemes.

Chul Ahn1, Fan Hu, William R Schucany

  • 1Department of Clinical Sciences, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, E5.506, Dallas, TX 75390.

Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
|February 23, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new sample size calculation method for dependent binary data within clusters. Optimal weighting minimizes sample size, especially with high intracluster correlation and unequal cluster sizes.

More Related Videos

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Methods
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Accurate sample size calculation is crucial for the validity of studies involving binary outcomes.
  • Dependent binary observations within clusters, common in many research areas, complicate traditional sample size determination.
  • Existing methods may not adequately account for intracluster correlation and varying cluster sizes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate sample size calculation methods for testing proportions with clustered binary data.
  • To compare the efficiency of different weighting schemes (equal observation weights, equal cluster weights, optimal weights) in sample size estimation.
  • To investigate the impact of intracluster correlation and cluster size variability on required sample sizes.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of nonparametric sample size formulas for the weighted sign test.
  • Incorporation of intracluster correlation and cluster size variability into the formulas.
  • Simulation studies to assess the finite sample performance and empirical power of the proposed methods.

Main Results:

  • The number of clusters needed increases with greater imbalance in cluster size and higher intracluster correlation.
  • The optimal weights estimator resulted in the smallest sample size estimates across simulations.
  • For low intracluster correlation, optimal weights align with equal observation weights; for high correlation, they align with equal cluster weights.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed weighted sign test offers a robust approach for sample size calculation in clustered binary data.
  • Optimal weighting is recommended for minimizing sample size, particularly when intracluster correlation is substantial.
  • The findings provide practical guidance for designing studies with dependent binary outcomes in clustered settings.