Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Development of a Quantitative Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay with an Internal Positive Control
Published on: March 30, 2015
Kinetic Quantitative PCR vs End-Point Quantitative PCR with Internal Standard
O Lantz1, E Bonney, F Griscelli
1Inserm Unit, Necker Hospital, Paris, France.
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) offers two main methods: end-point and kinetic. This chapter details their characteristics, compares their pros and cons, and highlights kinetic qPCR applications.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a vital technique for measuring nucleic acid quantities.
- Two primary approaches exist: end-point and kinetic quantitative PCR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define and differentiate end-point and kinetic quantitative PCR methods.
- To compare the advantages and disadvantages of each quantitative PCR approach.
- To present applications of the kinetic quantitative PCR method.
Main Methods:
- End-point quantitative PCR: measures PCR product at a specific cycle.
- Kinetic quantitative PCR: monitors product accumulation throughout the PCR cycles.
Main Results:
- Detailed definitions and characteristics of both end-point and kinetic qPCR.
- Comparative analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each method.
- Illustrative examples of kinetic qPCR in practical applications.
Conclusions:
- Understanding the distinctions between end-point and kinetic qPCR is crucial for method selection.
- Kinetic qPCR offers dynamic monitoring with potential advantages in certain applications.
- The presented applications showcase the utility of kinetic qPCR in research.
More Related Videos
08:54Development and Testing of Species-specific Quantitative PCR Assays for Environmental DNA Applications
Published on: November 5, 2020
12:14A Duplex Digital PCR Assay for Simultaneous Quantification of the Enterococcus spp. and the Human Fecal-associated HF183 Marker in Waters
Published on: March 9, 2016