Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The differential role of language and executive functions in the relation between socioeconomic status and theory of mind in preschool and school-aged children.

Trends in neuroscience and education·2026
Same author

Movement Sonification Types and Triggers: A Systematic Review.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same author

Academic Resilience in Contexts of Inequality: Motivational and Self-Efficacy Profiles of Disadvantaged High Achievers.

Journal of adolescence·2026
Same author

Executive functions as mediators of early educational disparities by SES, gender and birth month.

NPJ science of learning·2026
Same author

Among well-being, cognitive, metacognitive and socio-emotional skills, executive functions best explain SES-achievement inequalities.

Trends in neuroscience and education·2026
Same author

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for an illusory truth effect and its determinants.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Gelastic dysarthria: Speech-triggered pathological laughter with evidence for a selective pontine gating mechanism.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Effects of Dieting on Neural Encoding of Preferences for Edible and Non-Edible Rewards: An ERP Study.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Spatial navigation training enhances performance on large-scale and small-scale spatial tasks through different neural mechanisms.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Unraveling the link between brain injury and enhanced artistic skills.

Brain and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data
06:36

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data

Published on: October 18, 2024

Individual differences in spatial relation processing: effects of strategy, ability, and gender.

Ineke J M van der Ham1, Gregoire Borst

  • 1Helmholtz Institute, Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. c.j.m.vanderham@uu.nl

Brain and Cognition
|March 1, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The study found that the left hemisphere advantage for categorical spatial relations processing is only present when individuals strongly use spatial strategies, not verbal ones. This highlights the role of spatial processing in understanding abstract spatial relationships.

More Related Videos

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
07:26

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm

Published on: May 4, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2026

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data
06:36

Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Rotation of Interactive Virtual Objects with Eye-Tracking Data

Published on: October 18, 2024

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
07:26

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm

Published on: May 4, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Research distinguishes between categorical (abstract, propositional) and coordinate (metric, spatial) relations, often linking them to left and right hemisphere processing, respectively.
  • However, the reported hemispheric lateralization, particularly the left hemisphere advantage for categorical relations, is not consistently observed across studies.
  • Discrepancies in lateralization findings may be influenced by factors like strategy use, cognitive abilities, and gender.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of verbal and spatial strategies, cognitive abilities, and gender on the hemispheric lateralization of categorical and coordinate spatial relation processing.
  • To clarify the inconsistent findings regarding the left hemisphere advantage for categorical spatial relations.

Main Methods:

  • Seventy-five participants completed two visual half-field, match-to-sample tasks designed to assess categorical and coordinate spatial relation processing.
  • Participant strategies (verbal vs. spatial) for each task were identified and analyzed.
  • Hemispheric lateralization patterns were examined in relation to strategy use and other demographic/cognitive variables.

Main Results:

  • An overall left hemisphere advantage for categorical relations and a right hemisphere advantage for coordinate relations were observed, consistent with prior research.
  • The degree of spatial strategy use significantly modulated the lateralization pattern.
  • Neither verbal strategy, cognitive abilities, nor gender affected the observed lateralization patterns.

Conclusions:

  • The categorical left hemisphere advantage for spatial relations processing is critically dependent on the reliance on spatial strategies.
  • These findings suggest that categorical spatial relation processing primarily involves spatial, rather than verbal, mechanisms.
  • The study provides further evidence for the role of strategy selection in shaping brain lateralization for spatial cognition.