Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

09:24
A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers
Published on: January 28, 2020
A semi-tethered test for power assessment in running
M C S Lima1, L F P Ribeiro, M Papoti
1Universidade do Oeste Paulista, Laboratório de Fisiologia do Exercício, Presidente Prudente, Brazil.
International Journal of Sports Medicine
|May 13, 2011
Summary
The semi-tethered running test (STR) effectively assesses anaerobic power in sprinters. Field-based power measures correlate better with running performance than laboratory tests, suggesting distinct anaerobic power and capacity entities.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Exercise Physiology
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Assessing anaerobic power is crucial for optimizing sprint performance.
- Existing laboratory tests may not fully capture the specific demands of field running.
- Understanding the relationship between different measures of anaerobic capacity and performance is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of a semi-tethered running test (STR) for assessing anaerobic power in trained sprinters.
- To examine the relationship between anaerobic power and capacity indices derived from STR and a cycloergometer Wingate Test (WT).
- To determine the correlation between these anaerobic measures and actual running performance.
Main Methods:
- Nine trained male sprinters performed an all-out 120m STR, a cycloergometer Wingate Test (WT), a 300m run, and a maximal accumulated oxygen deficit (MAOD) test on a treadmill.
- Force and velocity were measured during STR to calculate peak and mean power.
- Pearson correlation coefficients were used to analyze relationships between variables.
Main Results:
- Peak and mean power outputs in STR were significantly higher than in WT.
- STR-derived power measures showed stronger correlations with running performance (r = 0.81-0.94) compared to WT measures (r = 0.68-0.84).
- Relationships between MAOD and power indices were generally weak to moderate.
Conclusions:
- The STR is a useful tool for assessing specific anaerobic power in a field running context.
- Anaerobic power and capacity appear to be distinct entities, regardless of the testing modality.
- STR provides more relevant power data for predicting running performance in sprinters than laboratory-based WT.
