Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning from experience in nonlinear environments: Evidence from a competition scenario.

Cognitive psychology·2015
Same author

Automatic processes, emotions, and the causal field.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
Same author

Assessing the chances of success: naïve statistics versus kind experience.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2012
Same author

The N-effect: possible effects of differential probabilities of success.

Psychological science·2010
Same author

Determinants of linear judgment: a meta-analysis of lens model studies.

Psychological bulletin·2008
Same author

What risks do people perceive in everyday life? A perspective gained from the experience sampling method (ESM).

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2007

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

Sequentially simulated outcomes: kind experience versus nontransparent description.

Robin M Hogarth1, Emre Soyer

  • 1Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. robin.hogarth@upf.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|June 7, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Experience-based probability judgments can be more accurate than descriptive ones, especially when descriptions are unclear. Simulated outcomes improved accuracy for all participants, even the statistically naïve.

More Related Videos

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
08:01

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency

Published on: October 28, 2020

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
08:01

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency

Published on: October 28, 2020

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Decision science
  • Behavioral economics

Background:

  • Decision-making relies on information from descriptions or direct experience.
  • The accuracy of probability judgments depends on information transparency and experience validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine when experience-based probability judgments outperform description-based ones.
  • To investigate the impact of simulated experience on probabilistic inference accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using probabilistic inference tasks and investment decision-making scenarios.
  • Participants' statistical sophistication varied, and experience was gained through simulated outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Statistically naïve participants achieved accurate probabilistic inferences after simulated experience.
  • Many participants preferred the experience-based (simulated outcomes) presentation format.

Conclusions:

  • Direct experience, particularly through simulated outcomes, can significantly enhance probabilistic inference accuracy.
  • This approach benefits even those with limited statistical knowledge, offering practical implications for training and decision support.