Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Biological explanations and stigmatizing attitudes: using essentialism and perceived dangerousness to predict
1State University of New York, Fredonia, Department of Psychology, W357 Thompson Hall, Fredonia, NY 14063, USA. guy.boysen@fredonia.edu
Abstract:
The theory of essentialism suggests that biological explanations of stigmatized behavior may not be effective at decreasing stigmatizing attitudes. The effects of biological explanations on stigmatizing attitudes were the topic of two experiments. In the first experiment, participants (N = 243) perceived a biological explanation as a less effective in relation to dangerousness and social distancing attitudes about mental illness than about homosexuality. The second experiment (N = 113) compared the effect of biological and free choice explanations on stigmatizing attitudes about abnormal sexual and eating behaviors. The results indicated that a biological explanation increased belief in essentialism and was most effective for attitudes related to anger and blame. These results suggest that the effectiveness of biological explanations as an antistigma tool varies according to the attitude and stigmatized group.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Stereotype Content Model
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Causes of Social Behavior III: Biological and Environmental Influences
Fundamental Attribution Error
Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...

