Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
Relationships between community-based processes for research ethics review and institution-based IRBs: a national
Nancy Shore1, Elaine Drew, Ruta Brazauskas
1University of New England School of Social Work, Portland, ME 04103, USA. nshore@une.edu
Community groups and institution-based research ethics boards (I-REBs) often review the same studies. Positive relationships, marked by communication, enhance ethical research reviews for community-engaged projects.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Research Ethics
- Community-Based Participatory Research
Background:
- Community groups are increasingly establishing their own research ethics review processes.
- These community-based review processes aim to guide research conduct within local contexts.
- Collaboration between community groups and institutional review boards is crucial for ethical research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To survey community-based research ethics review processes regarding their interactions with institution-based research ethics boards (I-REBs).
- To identify factors influencing the quality of relationships between community review processes and I-REBs.
- To understand challenges and facilitators in the collaboration between community and institutional ethics review.
Main Methods:
- A survey was distributed to 109 community-based research ethics review processes.
- The survey assessed the nature of their relationships with institution-based research ethics boards (I-REBs).
- Statistical analysis was used to identify correlations between relationship quality and communication frequency.
Main Results:
- 92% of surveyed community review processes reported that their studies were also reviewed by an I-REB.
- Over half of the community review processes described their relationship with I-REBs as positive.
- Positive relationships were significantly associated with increased communication between community review processes and I-REBs.
- Key challenges included delays, communication issues, and a lack of understanding of community-based participatory research by I-REBs.
Conclusions:
- Strengthening collaborative relationships between community-based review processes and I-REBs is essential.
- Enhanced communication and mutual understanding can improve the review of community-engaged research.
- Fostering better partnerships can lead to more effective and ethical research practices in communities.
More Related Videos
08:10Neuroimaging Field Methods Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) Neuroimaging to Study Global Child Development: Rural Sub-Saharan Africa
Published on: February 2, 2018
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Ethics and Bioethics
International Nursing Organizations I
ICN member organizations work to advance the field of nursing and healthcare via policies, partnerships, lobbying, professional...