Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity01:23

Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity

The similarity hypothesis suggests that individuals are more likely to form relationships with others who share similar attitudes, beliefs, values, and interests. This concept has been widely studied in social psychology, demonstrating that perceived similarity fosters interpersonal attraction. In an experiment supporting this hypothesis, participants were presented with fabricated information indicating that strangers held attitudes similar to their own. The results showed that participants...
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anchoring on Self and Others During Social Inferences.

Topics in cognitive science·2017
Same author

Introduction: 2016 Rumelhart Prize Issue Honoring Dedre Gentner.

Topics in cognitive science·2017
Same author

Determining transformation distance in similarity: Considerations for assessing representational changes a priori.

Thinking & reasoning·2016
Same author

The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.

Cognitive processing·2016
Same author

Stereotype Fit Effects for Golf Putting Nonexperts.

Sport, exercise, and performance psychology·2016
Same author

Licensing Novel Role-Governed Categories: An ERP Analysis.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Processes of similarity judgment.

Levi B Larkey1, Arthur B Markman

  • 1Computer and Computational Sciences Division, Los Alamos National LaboratoryDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.

Cognitive Science
|June 28, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study tested models of cognitive similarity, finding that the Similarity as Interactive Activation and Mapping (SIAM) model best explains how people rate similarities between concepts. This advances our understanding of core cognitive processes.

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Similarity is a foundational concept in cognition, crucial for memory, categorization, decision-making, problem-solving, and reasoning.
  • Existing computational models of similarity differ in their proposed mechanisms for representing and processing relational information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically differentiate between competing structural accounts of cognitive similarity.
  • To identify which computational model best predicts human similarity judgments.

Main Methods:

  • An experiment was designed to collect human similarity ratings for various stimuli.
  • These empirical data were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of different theoretical models of similarity.

Main Results:

  • The experimental data presented significant challenges for transformation-based models of similarity.
  • Most mapping-based models also failed to account for the observed patterns of similarity ratings.
  • The Similarity as Interactive Activation and Mapping (SIAM) model demonstrated superior explanatory power.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support interactive activation and mapping mechanisms as key components of cognitive similarity.
  • This research refines our understanding of the computational processes underlying human judgments of similarity.