Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026
06:45
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
The null hypothesis: closing the gap between good intentions and good studies.
David R Meldrum1, Mary D Sammel, Kurt Barnhart
1Reproductive Partners Medical Group, 510 N. Prospect Ave., Suite 202, Redondo Beach, CA 90277, USA. davidmeldrum@earthlink.net
Fertility and Sterility
|July 5, 2011
Summary
Many clinical research papers contain critical flaws in design and analysis. Improving manuscript quality requires awareness of common errors and adherence to reporting standards for better scientific publication.
Area of Science:
- Clinical research methodology
- Scientific publication standards
Background:
- Leading clinical journals frequently publish studies with fundamental defects.
- These deficiencies span study design, statistical analysis, and reporting practices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight common errors in clinical research publications.
- To guide investigators on best practices from planning to manuscript submission.
- To emphasize the importance of quality control in scientific publishing.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of actual publications to illustrate common pitfalls.
- Reference to supplementary materials detailing statistical methods in reproductive research.
- Discussion of the necessity for parameter registry in randomized clinical trials.
Main Results:
- Identified fundamental defects in study design, statistical analysis, and reporting in published clinical research.
- Highlighted the significance of comprehensive parameter registry for randomized clinical trials.
- Underscored the need for increased author and reviewer awareness of common errors.
Conclusions:
- Authors and reviewers must be more cognizant of requirements and common pitfalls.
- Adherence to rigorous standards is essential for publishing high-quality clinical research.
- Implementing robust quality control measures will improve the reliability of published scientific findings.
Related Concept Videos
01:17Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
01:16Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
01:13Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
01:16Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
01:14Errors In Hypothesis Tests
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...