Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: Russian validation of the teacher version and comparison of teacher and
Vladislav Ruchkin1, Roman Koposov, Robert Vermeiren
1Department of Social and Forensic Psychiatry, Division of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. vladislav.ruchkin@yale.edu
Objective:
To confirm factor structure of the teacher Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and to compare teacher and student reports in Russian youth.
Method:
The SDQ and psychopathology measures were completed by teachers in a representative sample of urban adolescents (N = 528). The factor structure was examined on two randomly selected split-halves of the sample, and using a gender split. The functional impairment score was predicted by the SDQ problem scales.
Results:
The fit for all models was acceptable. The fit did not decrease when applying increasing constraints in the random-split model, but became significantly worse for the gender model, suggesting lack of measure invariance. SDQ problem scales explained 37% of functional impairment variance. Significant scale interaction (emotional problems*peer problems and conduct problems*hyperactivity) suggest that combination of these problems produces an additional impact on functioning.
Conclusions:
The SDQ teacher report may represent a potentially useful screener for children and youth.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Reliability and Validity
Self-Report Tests of Personality