Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Time Multiplexing Super Resolving Technique for Imaging from a Moving Platform
Published on: February 12, 2014
Investigation into the optimal linear time-invariant lag correction for radar artifact removal
Jared Starman1, Josh Star-Lack, Gary Virshup
1Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA. jstarman@stanford.edu
Understanding detector lag in amorphous silicon flat-panel detectors is crucial for reducing shading artifacts in cone-beam CT. Using falling step-response function (FSRF) data at low exposures best corrects these artifacts.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiological Imaging
- Detector Technology
Background:
- Detector lag, a residual signal in amorphous silicon (a-Si) flat-panel (FP) detectors, causes shading artifacts in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
- Existing correction models often use a linear, time-invariant (LTI) approach with impulse response functions (IRFs), but IRF determination methods vary.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate detector lag in the Varian 4030CB FP detector.
- To identify the optimal IRF measurement technique for minimizing CBCT shading artifacts.
Main Methods:
- Examined lag linearity using rising and falling step-response functions (RSRF/FSRF) at various exposure levels.
- Implemented a multiexponential LTI model for lag correction.
- Evaluated different IRF determination techniques (RSRF vs. FSRF, exposure intensity, exposure duration, spatial position).
- Applied IRFs to projection data and CBCT scans of phantoms.
Main Results:
- Observed significant nonlinearity (>50%) in FSRF data, leading to over/undercorrection when using mismatched IRF calibration.
- CBCT reconstructions showed residual errors of 3-21 HU depending on the IRF technique.
- FSRF-based techniques at low exposures (1.6-3.4% saturation) yielded the lowest average error for CBCT.
Conclusions:
- The selection of RSRF/FSRF and exposure intensity for IRF calibration significantly impacts residual lag.
- IRFs derived from FSRF data at low exposure intensities are most effective for correcting CBCT shading artifacts.
- The choice of IRF for lag correction can be optimized based on object size.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any finite,...
Linear Approximation in Time Domain
For a simple pendulum with a mass evenly distributed along its length and the center of mass located at half the pendulum's length, the...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference
Spectral interference occurs when signals from other elements or molecules overlap with the analyte signal, falsely elevating or masking the analyte's absorbance. This interference can be corrected using Zeeman,...
Linear time-invariant Systems
The input-output behavior of an LTI system can be fully defined by its response to an impulsive excitation at its input. Once this impulse response is known, the system's reaction to any other input can be calculated...

