Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sampling Methods: Overview01:06

Sampling Methods: Overview

A sample refers to a smaller subset representative of a larger population. In analytical chemistry, studying or analyzing an entire population is often impractical or impossible. Therefore, samples are used to draw inferences and generalize the whole population. The sampling method selects individuals or items from a population to create a sample. Standard sampling methods include random, judgemental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling. 
In analytical chemistry, the choice of sampling...
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Convenience Sampling Method00:55

Convenience Sampling Method

Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bridging ancient wisdom and cognitive engagement: a comparative study of chatbot-based moral instruction.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same author

Toward a science of human-AI teaming for decision making: A complementarity framework.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

SFEL a machine learning framework for forecasting radar backscatter based ground deformation.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Instructional modality influences neurocognitive engagement during moral learning.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Emergent cooperative decision-making in triadic Prisoner's Dilemmas: Effects of incentives and information.

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

FDRL: a data-driven algorithm for forecasting subsidence velocities in Himalayas using conventional and traditional soil features.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Perception and action as one: Re-integrating research on human action through event files.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Associative learning explains "intuitive statistics" in animals.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

The relative psychometric function: A general analysis framework for relating psychological processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

A taxonomy of discriminatory behavior.

Psychological review·2026
Same journal

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Instance-based learning: integrating sampling and repeated decisions from experience.

Cleotilde Gonzalez1, Varun Dutt

  • 1Dynamic Decision Making Laboratory, Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. coty@cmu.edu

Psychological Review
|August 3, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decisions from experience in sampling and repeated-choice paradigms share common cognitive processes. Instance-based learning theory (IBLT) unifies these paradigms, with the stopping point being the key differentiator.

More Related Videos

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning
11:20

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning

Published on: June 2, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning
11:20

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning

Published on: June 2, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Decision science
  • Computational modeling

Background:

  • Decisions from experience are studied via sampling and repeated-choice paradigms.
  • These paradigms have been investigated independently, often assuming distinct cognitive processes.
  • Existing computational models for each paradigm are diverse and specialized.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate that sampling and repeated-choice paradigms rely on common cognitive processes.
  • To propose a unified cognitive model based on instance-based learning theory (IBLT).
  • To integrate these paradigms by identifying the stopping point as the primary difference.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing instance-based learning theory (IBLT) to model behavior across both paradigms.
  • Developing a single cognitive model incorporating a stopping point rule for the sampling paradigm.
  • Employing quantitative model comparison to evaluate IBLT against existing specialized models.

Main Results:

  • Behavior in both sampling and repeated-choice paradigms is explained by common cognitive processes within IBLT.
  • A single IBLT-based model accurately captures human choices and predicts choice sequences across paradigms.
  • IBLT significantly outperforms the best models developed for each paradigm individually.

Conclusions:

  • The instance-based learning theory (IBLT) provides a unified framework for understanding decisions from experience.
  • The stopping point is the critical factor differentiating sampling and repeated-choice experimental paradigms.
  • This research integrates previously disparate findings, advancing the psychology of decision making.