Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
How low should you go? The limbo of glycemic control in intensive care units
Andrew C Faust1, Rebecca L Attridge, Laurajo Ryan
1Methodist University Hospital, Dept of Pharmacy, Memphis, TN 38104, USA. rphfaust@gmail.com
Insights
Intensive insulin therapy for critically ill patients showed initial promise but later studies revealed increased mortality and hypoglycemia. Current guidelines suggest alternative blood glucose targets for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Critical care medicine
- Endocrinology
- Clinical research
Background:
- Hyperglycemia is common in critically ill patients and associated with adverse outcomes.
- The initial Leuven I study (2001) suggested intensive insulin therapy reduced mortality in surgical ICUs.
- Subsequent studies yielded mixed results, with some showing no significant mortality benefit.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.
- To determine if the initial benefits observed in the Leuven I study are reproducible.
- To assess the risk of hypoglycemia associated with intensive insulin therapy.
Main Methods:
- Review of key clinical trials evaluating intensive insulin therapy in critically ill populations.
- Comparison of mortality rates and hypoglycemia incidence between intensive insulin therapy and conventional glucose control.
- Analysis of data from single-center, medical ICU, and multicenter studies.
Main Results:
- The initial Leuven I study reported a 3.4% absolute mortality reduction.
- Subsequent studies, including multicenter trials, showed no significant mortality benefit.
- Some studies were halted early due to significantly higher rates of hypoglycemia with intensive insulin therapy, which was linked to increased mortality.
- The largest prospective study found significantly higher mortality in the intensive therapy group (27.5%) versus control (24.9%).
Conclusions:
- Intensive insulin therapy does not consistently benefit all critically ill patients.
- The risk of hypoglycemia and associated increased mortality must be considered.
- Alternative blood glucose targets (e.g., 140-180 mg/dL) are proposed to balance glycemic control and safety.
Abstract:
Hyperglycemia, a common finding in critically ill patients, is linked to poor outcomes in multiple conditions. The Leuven I study published in 2001 was the first evaluation of intensive insulin therapy, and the 3.4% absolute reduction in mortality in a single-center surgical intensive care unit led to widespread endorsement of the therapy. In a subsequent study in a medical intensive care unit, reduction in mortality was not significant. Two multicenter studies were stopped early because of significantly higher rates of hypoglycemia in the patients receiving intensive insulin therapy. The episodes of hypoglycemia were linked to increased mortality. In the largest prospective study conducted to date, mortality was significantly higher (P = .02) in patients who had intensive therapy (27.5%) than in control patients (24.9%). Thus, after years of research, intensive insulin therapy does not appear to convey the original benefit in all critically ill patients. Several organizations have proposed alternative blood glucose targets, such as 140 to 180 mg/dL, to both provide glycemic control and reduce the opportunity for hypoglycemic episodes.
Related Concept Videos
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Hypoglycemia
Diabetic Ketoacidosis l: Introduction
Diabetic Ketoacidosis ll: Pathophysiology
Hyperglycemia
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
