Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

AAPM tutorial. Physics of mammography: image recording process.

M J Yaffe1

  • 1Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Ont., Canada.

Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
|March 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breast cancer screening policy-good science should trump bad politics.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2020
Same author

Three-dimensional tumor visualization of invasive breast carcinomas using whole-mount serial section histopathology: implications for tumor size assessment.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2019
Same author

Factors influencing survival among patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2018
Same author

Cost-effectiveness analysis of whole-mount pathology processing for patients with early breast cancer undergoing breast conservation.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2016
Same author

Point: Mammography screening-sticking to the science.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2015
Same author

A task-based quality control metric for digital mammography.

Physics in medicine and biology·2014
Same journal

MRI of Lesions Growing Along the Pituitary Stalk.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Invited Commentary: Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Are We Up for the Challenge?

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Radiology Board Examinations: A Fundamental Shift.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Early Pancreatic Cancer: Clinical Implications, Workup, and Imaging Findings with Histopathologic Correlation for Personalized Surveillance.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Approach to Prostate Cancer Metastasis Mimics at Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Invited Commentary: Postdeployment Monitoring of AI in Radiology: Beyond the Test Set.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
See all related articles

This tutorial reviews physical factors affecting mammography image quality and processing. It details screen-film physics, quality control methods, xeromammography, and magnification mammography principles.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Physics
  • Imaging Science

Background:

  • Mammography is a critical tool for breast cancer screening.
  • Image quality is paramount for accurate diagnosis in mammography.
  • Understanding the underlying physics is essential for optimizing mammographic imaging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive review of physical factors influencing mammography image processing and quality.
  • To detail the physics principles of screen-film mammographic image receptors.
  • To discuss quality control methods and principles of xeromammography and magnification mammography.

Main Methods:

  • Review of physical factors impacting mammography.
  • Detailed discussion of screen-film mammography physics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Explanation of quality control techniques.
  • Overview of xeromammography and magnification mammography principles.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key physical factors affecting mammography image quality.
    • Elucidated the physics of screen-film image receptors.
    • Presented quality control strategies for mammography.
    • Outlined principles of alternative mammography techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • A thorough understanding of physical factors enhances mammography image quality and processing.
    • Quality control is vital for reliable mammographic diagnoses.
    • Xeromammography and magnification mammography offer specific advantages and require distinct principles.