Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

Overview
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the truth effect's reliability and test-retest stability.

Consciousness and cognition·2025
Same author

Reconceptualizing ethically and socially aversive ("dark") personality traits.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same author

Four big problems of big five agreeableness.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same author

Aversive societal conditions explain differences in "dark" personality across countries and US states.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

On the relationship between recognition judgments and truth judgments: Memory states moderate the recognition-based truth effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Waking rest during retention facilitates memory consolidation, but so does social media use.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Exploring psychological tradeoffs: Developing and demonstrating an R Shiny app for Pareto optimization.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

The performance of Bayesian fit measures in detecting misspecified multilevel structural equation modeling.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Psychometric functions from multiple responses : Dedicated to the memory of Colin L. Mallows.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Low-cost, open-source, full-stack software and Arduino-based hardware for control of commercially available animal behavior systems.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

PyNeon: A Python package for the analysis of Neon multimodal mobile eye-tracking data.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Talking surveys: How photorealistic embodied conversational agents shape response quality, engagement, and satisfaction.

Behavior research methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

A stochastic lie detector.

Morten Moshagen1, Jochen Musch, Edgar Erdfelder

  • 1Institute for Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. morten.moshagen@uni-duesseldorf.de

Behavior Research Methods
|August 23, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an enhanced randomized-response technique (RRT) to improve the accuracy of survey data on sensitive topics. The improved RRT method ensures undistorted prevalence estimates, even when participants do not respond truthfully.

More Related Videos

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Survey Methodology
  • Social Sciences

Background:

  • Surveys on sensitive issues often yield inaccurate prevalence estimates due to participants' reluctance to respond truthfully.
  • The randomized-response technique (RRT) enhances confidentiality by introducing random noise, but some respondents may still refuse to disclose information.
  • Existing RRT methods may not fully address the issue of non-truthful responses, leading to potential biases in prevalence estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate an extension of Mangat's randomized-response technique (RRT).
  • To enable the determination of truthful responding within survey participants.
  • To provide undistorted prevalence estimates for sensitive attributes, even with non-truthful responses.

Main Methods:

  • An extension of Mangat's randomized-response technique (RRT) was developed to identify truthful respondents.
  • The method was implemented using closed-form equations and multinomial processing tree models.
  • Two survey experiments were conducted to test the validity of the extended RRT approach.

Main Results:

  • The proposed extension of Mangat's RRT successfully allows for the identification of truthful responses.
  • The method provides accurate and undistorted prevalence estimates for sensitive attributes.
  • Experimental results validated the effectiveness of the enhanced RRT in improving data integrity.

Conclusions:

  • The extended randomized-response technique (RRT) offers a significant advancement in obtaining reliable data on sensitive topics.
  • This method overcomes limitations of previous RRT approaches by accounting for non-truthful participants.
  • The approach is practical for implementation using available statistical software and equations, enhancing survey research on sensitive issues.