Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Testing the Efficacy of Pharmacological Agents in a Pericardial Target Delivery Model in the Swine
Published on: July 7, 2016
The preoperative cardiology consultation: goal settings and great expectations
Emre Aslanger1, Ibrahim Altun, Goksel Guz
1Department of Cardiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Capa-Istanbul, Turkey. mr_aslanger@hotmail.com
Insights
Preoperative cardiology consultations are frequently overused, leading to unnecessary tests and decreased cost-effectiveness. Applying established algorithms can help prevent unnecessary evaluations for elective surgery patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Preoperative cardiology consultation guidelines exist but their real-world effectiveness is unclear.
- Overutilization may cause unnecessary investigations, longer hospital stays, and surgical cancellations.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate the impact of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology algorithm.
- Assess the algorithm's potential to prevent unnecessary preoperative evaluations.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 712 patients undergoing elective surgery.
- Examined patient characteristics, consultant findings, and impact on clinical decisions/therapy.
Main Results:
- 'Pre-operative evaluation' was the most common reason for consultation (80.9%).
- Cardiologists identified abnormalities in 67.8% but influenced decisions in only 36.9%.
- Applying the algorithm to routine requests revealed only 7.6% needed further investigation.
Conclusions:
- Preoperative cardiology consultations appear overused, driven by a low threshold for requests.
- Non-specific consultation requests lead to unnecessary investigations and reduced cost-effectiveness.
- Cardiologists' findings often add little to clinical decision-making.
Background:
Despite the availability of guidelines for preoperative cardiology consultations, their efficacy in real clinical practice remains unknown. Furthermore, there are concerns that overused cardiology consultations can lead to unnecessary investigations, prolonged hospital stays, and even cancellation of necessary surgery. In this retrospective study, we investigated: (i) the potential impact of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology algorithm and (ii) the potential of this algorithm for preventing unnecessary evaluation.
Methods:
We examined the cardiology consultation requests for 712 patients scheduled for elective surgery. Our analysis included: (i) patient characteristics, (ii) abnormalities revealed by the consultant, (iii) impact of these abnormalities on clinical decision making and therapy modification.
Results:
The most common reason for consultation was 'pre-operative evaluation' (80.9%). Although our cardiologists revealed an abnormality in 67.8% and recommended further work up in 58.7% of our patients, they contributed to the clinical course in only 36.9%. Moreover, when the algorithm was applied to 'routine pre-operative evaluation' requests lacking a specific question, only 7.6% of these consultation requests required further investigation.
Conclusion:
Preoperative cardiology consultation seems to be overused. Although the fear of missing important issues leads surgeons to use a decreased threshold for pre-operative consultation requests, such a non-specific manner of pre-operative consultation request causes unnecessary investigations and decreased cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, the detection of any clinical abnormality by cardiologists surprisingly adds little to clinical decision making.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management
