Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy
08:34

Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy

Published on: January 2, 2026

Robot-assisted partial and total splenectomy.

Pier C Giulianotti1, Nicolas C Buchs, Pietro Addeo

  • 1Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA. piercg@uic.edu

The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery : MRCAS
|September 29, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

White paper: robotic cholecystectomy-new technology but safe principles still apply.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Prognostic relevance and molecular correlates of Claudin-1 expression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Human pathology·2026
Same author

Proteomic Signatures of Adiposomes Track Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction Following Bariatric Surgery.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Minimally Invasive Left Pancreatectomy With the Critical View of Safety and the Caudal Approach: A Standardized Technique for Training.

Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques·2026
Same author

ASO Video Abstract: How to Deal with Median Arcuate Ligament during Pancreaticoduodenectomy? Management Strategies and Impact on Perioperative Outcomes.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Predicting Best Performers After Minimally Invasive Left Pancreatectomy: Insights From a National Cohort.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same journal

Compliance Control of a Robotic Breast Ultrasound System Based on Variable Admittance Control.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
Same journal

Short-Term Outcomes of Upper-Dome Overlap Single-Flap Valvuloplasty Versus Kamikawa Anastomosis in Robotic Proximal Gastrectomy.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Admittance Control for Robotic Ultrasound Examination Based on a Breast Biomechanical Model.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
Same journal

Robotic Choledochal Cyst Excision With Intracorporeal Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy in Adolescent and Adult Patients: Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
Same journal

Short-Term Outcomes and Quality of Life After Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Double-Flap Technique for Proximal Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
Same journal

Dual-Modal Safety Framework for Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy via Endoscopic Vision and Haptic Feedback.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2026
See all related articles

Robotic partial and total splenectomy procedures are safe and feasible, offering benefits over traditional laparoscopic methods, especially in complex cases. This minimally invasive approach demonstrates good patient outcomes with low complication rates.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Robotics
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Robotic-assisted surgery for splenectomy is not widely documented.
  • Limited data exists on the efficacy and safety of robotic splenectomy procedures.
  • This study addresses the gap in reporting robotic partial and total splenectomies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted partial and total splenectomy.
  • To compare robotic splenectomy outcomes with traditional laparoscopic approaches.
  • To highlight the benefits of robotic surgery in complex splenectomy cases.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of 24 consecutive robotic splenectomies performed between November 2001 and November 2009.
  • Data collected prospectively by a single surgeon.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy
08:34

Robot-assisted Partial Splenectomy

Published on: January 2, 2026

  • Analysis of operative time, blood loss, complications, and hospital stay.

    • Main Results:

    • The study included 24 patients (12 male, 12 female) with a median age of 48 years.
    • Indications included ABO incompatibility, hematological diseases, and miscellaneous pathologies.
    • Mean operative time was 199 minutes, median blood loss was 75 ml, with 8.3% postoperative morbidity and no mortality.

    Conclusions:

    • Robotic partial and total splenectomy are safe and feasible surgical options.
    • Robotic splenectomy offers advantages, particularly in challenging cases.
    • This approach is a viable alternative to standard laparoscopic splenectomy.