Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
A consensus curriculum for laboratory management training for pathology residents
Ronald L Weiss1, Barbara J McKenna, Melissa Lord-Toof
1Dept of Pathology and ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
This article describes the development of a standardized curriculum for teaching laboratory management skills to pathology residents. The American Pathology Foundation, the American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the Program Directors Section of the Association of Pathology Chairs collaborated to create this resource. They conducted surveys, workshops, and formed a work group to identify common training needs and resource limitations. The resulting curriculum was designed as a wiki to allow easy access and updates. The goal was to provide a practical tool for residency program directors and faculty to use in training residents in laboratory management.
Area of Science:
- Medical education in pathology
- Residency training program development
- Healthcare management education
Background:
Training pathology residents in laboratory management remains a challenge. Prior research has shown that residency programs often lack standardized approaches to teaching management skills. It was already known that pathology residents require both clinical and administrative training. No prior work had resolved how to systematize this training effectively. This gap motivated the need for a structured curriculum. That uncertainty drove collaboration among professional organizations. Residency program directors faced common resource limitations. No prior work had addressed these shared constraints systematically.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this initiative was to develop a standardized curriculum for laboratory management training. Pathology residency programs often lack consistent frameworks for teaching management skills. This study sought to address that specific problem. Collaborative efforts were needed to identify common training needs. The motivation stemmed from the lack of a unified approach. Residency directors required a practical resource to guide training. The goal was to create a tool adaptable to diverse program settings. This study aimed to bridge the gap between clinical and administrative training.
Main Methods:
A needs assessment was conducted using a survey distributed via the PRODS listserv. Workshops were held at APC/PRODS annual meetings in 2009 and 2010. A Work Group composed of APF, ASCP, and PRODS representatives was formed. Input from these sources guided curriculum development. The curriculum was designed to address common training needs. It was structured to accommodate resource limitations in residency programs. The final product was formatted as a wiki for easy access and updates. The wiki was intended for use by program directors, residents, and faculty.
Main Results:
A comprehensive needs assessment revealed shared challenges in training pathology residents. The survey and workshops identified common resource constraints across programs. The Work Group developed a consensus-based curriculum addressing these needs. The curriculum was designed to be flexible and adaptable to various settings. It included content on laboratory operations and management practices. The wiki format allowed for collaborative updates and modifications. Program directors found the tool useful for guiding training activities. The final product served as a practical resource for residency training.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that a standardized curriculum can help address training gaps in pathology residency programs. The consensus-based approach ensured broad applicability and practicality. The wiki format supports ongoing updates and collaboration. Program directors may find the tool useful for managing training resources. The study suggests that collaborative efforts improve training consistency. The curriculum may help address common challenges in residency management. The authors state that the tool is intended for use by program directors and faculty. The study concludes that a shared resource can enhance training effectiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions
The authors propose a consensus-based approach using surveys, workshops, and a work group to identify training needs.
The wiki allows program directors, residents, and faculty to access and update the curriculum collaboratively.
The wiki supports ongoing modifications and adaptability to different residency program needs.
The Work Group was formed to develop a consensus curriculum addressing common training needs.
The study found that residency programs face common resource constraints in training pathology residents.
The authors suggest the curriculum may help improve training consistency across residency programs.
Related Concept Videos
Key Techniques in Microbiology
Sputum Studies I: Gram Stain, cytology, and Acid-fast smear and culture
Gram Stain
The Gram Stain is an integral part of sputum studies. It involves the staining of sputum, which permits...

