Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Motor Unit Stimulation01:20

Motor Unit Stimulation

When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Tissue Homogenization and Cell Lysis01:32

Tissue Homogenization and Cell Lysis

Tissue homogenization involves disintegrating tissue architecture and lysing cells, and is an early step in isolating and analyzing cellular components. The method used for homogenization depends on the sample type, the amount of sample available, the analyte to be obtained, and the sensitivity of the method. These methods are broadly classified as mechanical and non-mechanical methods.
Mechanical methods of tissue homogenization
These methods rely on applying external physical force to disrupt...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rapid Estimation of Microbial Numbers on Meat and Poultry by the Direct Epifluorescent Filter Technique.

Journal of food protection·2019
Same author

An elevated temperature study of a Ti adhesion layer on polyimide.

Thin solid films·2013
Same author

The minimum quantity of nitrite required to stain sliced and homogenised cooked pork.

Meat science·2011
Same author

Effect of different electrical stimulation and chilling treatments on pork quality.

Meat science·2011
Same author

The effect of low voltage and high voltageelectrical stimulation on pork quality.

Meat science·2011
Same author

Improving pork quality by electricalstimulation or pelvic suspension ofcarcasses.

Meat science·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2026

Introducing an Angle Adjustable Cutting Box for Analyzing Slice Shear Force in Meat
09:30

Introducing an Angle Adjustable Cutting Box for Analyzing Slice Shear Force in Meat

Published on: April 26, 2013

Hot deboning beef with and without electrical stimulation.

A A Taylor1, B G Shaw, D B Macdougall

  • 1ARC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY, Great Britain.

Meat Science
|November 8, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Hot deboning beef reduces evaporative and drip losses compared to cold deboning. Both methods yield similar eating quality and bacterial counts, with hot deboning offering improved color uniformity.

More Related Videos

Exploring the Longissimus Muscle: Unraveling its Correlation with Meat Quality in Bos indicus and Crossbred Bulls
07:46

Exploring the Longissimus Muscle: Unraveling its Correlation with Meat Quality in Bos indicus and Crossbred Bulls

Published on: July 12, 2024

Intra-Operative Neural Monitoring of Thyroid Surgery in a Porcine Model
08:16

Intra-Operative Neural Monitoring of Thyroid Surgery in a Porcine Model

Published on: February 11, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2026

Introducing an Angle Adjustable Cutting Box for Analyzing Slice Shear Force in Meat
09:30

Introducing an Angle Adjustable Cutting Box for Analyzing Slice Shear Force in Meat

Published on: April 26, 2013

Exploring the Longissimus Muscle: Unraveling its Correlation with Meat Quality in Bos indicus and Crossbred Bulls
07:46

Exploring the Longissimus Muscle: Unraveling its Correlation with Meat Quality in Bos indicus and Crossbred Bulls

Published on: July 12, 2024

Intra-Operative Neural Monitoring of Thyroid Surgery in a Porcine Model
08:16

Intra-Operative Neural Monitoring of Thyroid Surgery in a Porcine Model

Published on: February 11, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Food Science
  • Meat Science
  • Postmortem Muscle Processing

Background:

  • Conventional meat processing involves side chilling followed by cold deboning, which can lead to cold shortening toughness.
  • Hot deboning offers potential advantages in reducing meat quality losses and improving processing efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of two hot deboning methods with conventional cold deboning on beef quality.
  • To evaluate evaporative losses, drip loss, color uniformity, bacterial contamination, and eating quality.

Main Methods:

  • Two hot deboning procedures (delay before chilling, electrical stimulation) were compared to conventional cold deboning.
  • Meat quality parameters including weight loss, drip loss, color, bacterial counts, and sensory attributes were assessed.

Main Results:

  • Hot deboning resulted in significantly lower evaporative losses (0.6%) compared to cold deboning (1.9%).
  • Drip loss was reduced with hot deboning, though electrical stimulation had a smaller effect.
  • Color uniformity in large muscles improved with hot deboning, with electrical stimulation showing a lesser benefit.
  • No significant differences in bacterial contamination, growth, or eating quality were observed across treatments.

Conclusions:

  • Hot deboning is an effective method for reducing meat quality losses during beef processing.
  • Hot deboning, with or without electrical stimulation, maintains meat eating quality and safety comparable to conventional cold deboning.