Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

06:14
A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons (Columba Livia)
Published on: September 7, 2018
Relational discrimination by pigeons in a go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli: a methodological note
Heloísa Cursi Campos1, Paula Debert, Romariz da Silva Barros
1Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, CogniÇão e Ensino, São Paulo, Brazil. heloccisa@yahoo.com.br
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
|November 16, 2011
Summary
Pigeons trained with a go/no-go compound stimulus procedure demonstrated symmetry but failed to exhibit transitivity and equivalence. This suggests limitations in avian analogical reasoning compared to humans.
Area of Science:
- Comparative psychology
- Animal behavior
- Cognitive science
Background:
- The go/no-go compound stimulus procedure is used to study emergent behavior in humans.
- This procedure typically assesses symmetric, transitive, and equivalence relations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if pigeons can learn symmetric, transitive, and equivalence relations using a go/no-go compound stimulus procedure.
- To compare pigeon performance to that of normally capable humans in similar tasks.
Main Methods:
- Pigeons were trained on a go/no-go task with two-component compound stimuli.
- Tests involved novel spatial arrangements and recombinative compounds to assess symmetry, transitivity, and equivalence.
- Behavior was analyzed based on responses (go) and non-responses (no-go) to different stimulus combinations.
Main Results:
- Pigeons successfully discriminated symmetric relations, responding to positive instances and withholding responses to negative instances.
- Pigeons failed to demonstrate transitivity and equivalence, showing inconsistent performance on these tests.
- The observed behavior in pigeons did not parallel the typical emergent recombinative discrimination seen in humans.
Conclusions:
- Pigeons can learn simple discriminations (symmetry) within a go/no-go compound stimulus framework.
- The go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli may not be sufficient to establish complex relational learning (transitivity, equivalence) in pigeons.
- Avian analogical reasoning may differ fundamentally from human capabilities, particularly in complex relational tasks.

